background image

73 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 13.230 

(b) The administrative law judge 

must grant the motion to withhold if, 
based on the motion and any response 
to the motion, the administrative law 
judge determines that: Disclosure 
would be detrimental to aviation safe-
ty; disclosure would not be in the pub-
lic interest; or the information is not 
otherwise required to be made avail-
able to the public. 

§ 13.227

Expert or opinion witnesses. 

An employee of the agency may not 

be called as an expert or opinion wit-
ness for any party other than the FAA 
in any proceeding governed by this sub-
part. An employee of a respondent may 
not be called by an agency attorney as 
an expert or opinion witness for the 
FAA in any proceeding governed by 
this subpart to which the respondent is 
a party. 

§ 13.228

Subpoenas. 

(a) 

Request for subpoena. The adminis-

trative law judge, upon application by 
any party to the proceeding, may issue 
subpoenas requiring the attendance of 
witnesses or the production of docu-
ments or tangible things at a hearing 
or for the purpose of taking deposi-
tions, as permitted by law. A request 
for a subpoena must show its general 
relevance and reasonable scope. The 
party must serve the subpoena on the 
witness or the holder of the documents 
or tangible items as permitted by ap-
plicable statute. A request for a sub-
poena must be filed and served in ac-
cordance with §§ 13.210 and 13.211, re-
spectively. Absent good cause shown, 
the filing and service must be com-
pleted as follows: 

(1) Not later than 15 days before a 

scheduled deposition under the sub-
poena; or 

(2) Not later than 30 days before a 

scheduled hearing where attendance at 
the hearing is sought. 

(b) 

Motion to quash or modify the sub-

poena.  A party, or any person upon 
whom a subpoena has been served, may 
file in the FAA Hearing Docket a mo-
tion to quash or modify the subpoena 
and must serve a copy on the adminis-
trative law judge and each party at or 
before the time specified in the sub-
poena for compliance. The movant 
must describe, in detail, the basis for 

the motion to quash or modify the sub-
poena including, but not limited to, a 
statement that the testimony, docu-
ment, or tangible evidence is not rel-
evant to the proceeding, that the sub-
poena is not reasonably tailored to the 
scope of the proceeding, or that the 
subpoena is unreasonable and oppres-
sive. A motion to quash or modify the 
subpoena will stay the effect of the 
subpoena pending a decision by the ad-
ministrative law judge on the motion. 

(c) 

Enforcement of subpoena. Upon a 

showing that a person has failed or re-
fused to comply with a subpoena, a 
party may apply to the appropriate 
U.S. district court to seek judicial en-
forcement of the subpoena. 

§ 13.229

Witness fees. 

(a) 

General. The party who applies for 

a subpoena to compel the attendance of 
a witness at a deposition or hearing, or 
the party at whose request a witness 
appears at a deposition or hearing, 
must pay the witness fees described in 
this section. 

(b) 

Amount.  Except for an employee 

of the agency who appears at the direc-
tion of the agency, a witness who ap-
pears at a deposition or hearing is enti-
tled to the same fees and allowances 
provided for under 28 U.S.C. 1821. 

§ 13.230

Record. 

(a) 

Exclusive record. The pleadings, 

transcripts of the hearing and pre-
hearing conferences, exhibits admitted 
into evidence, rulings, motions, appli-
cations, requests, briefs, and responses 
thereto, constitute the exclusive record 
for decision of the proceedings and the 
basis for the issuance of any orders in 
the proceeding. Any proceedings re-
garding the disqualification of an ad-
ministrative law judge must be in-
cluded in the record. Though only ex-
hibits admitted into evidence are part 
of the record before an administrative 
law judge, evidence proffered but not 
admitted is also part of the record on 
appeal, as provided by § 13.225. 

(b) 

Examination and copying of record. 

The parties may examine the record at 
the FAA Hearing Docket and may ob-
tain copies of the record upon payment 
of applicable fees. Any other person 
may obtain copies of the releasable 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

74 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 13.231 

portions of the record in accordance 
with applicable law. 

§ 13.231

Argument before the adminis-

trative law judge. 

(a) 

Arguments during the hearing. Dur-

ing the hearing, the administrative law 
judge must give the parties a reason-
able opportunity to present arguments 
on the record supporting or opposing 
motions, objections, and rulings if the 
parties request an opportunity for ar-
gument. The administrative law judge 
may request written arguments during 
the hearing if the administrative law 
judge finds that submission of written 
arguments would be reasonable. 

(b) 

Final oral argument. At the conclu-

sion of the hearing and before the ad-
ministrative law judge issues an initial 
decision in the proceedings, the admin-
istrative law judge must allow the par-
ties to submit oral proposed findings of 
fact and conclusions of law, exceptions 
to rulings of the administrative law 
judge, and supporting arguments for 
the findings, conclusions, or excep-
tions. At the conclusion of the hearing, 
a party may waive final oral argument. 

(c) 

Post-hearing briefs. The adminis-

trative law judge may request written 
post-hearing briefs before the adminis-
trative law judge issues an initial deci-
sion in the proceedings if the adminis-
trative law judge finds that submission 
of written arguments would be reason-
able. If a party files a written post- 
hearing brief, the party must include 
proposed findings of fact and conclu-
sions of law, exceptions to rulings of 
the administrative law judge, and sup-
porting arguments for the findings, 
conclusions, or exceptions. The admin-
istrative law judge must give the par-
ties a reasonable opportunity, but not 
more than 30 days after receipt of the 
transcript, to prepare and submit the 
briefs. A party must file and serve any 
post-hearing brief in in accordance 
with §§ 13.210 and 13.211, respectively. 

§ 13.232

Initial decision. 

(a) 

Contents.  The administrative law 

judge must issue an initial decision at 
the conclusion of the hearing. In each 
oral or written decision, the adminis-
trative law judge must include findings 
of fact and conclusions of law, as well 
as the grounds supporting those find-

ings and conclusions, for all material 
issues of fact, the credibility of wit-
nesses, the applicable law, any exercise 
of the administrative law judge’s dis-
cretion, and the amount of any civil 
penalty found appropriate by the ad-
ministrative law judge. The adminis-
trative law judge must also include a 
discussion of the basis for any order 
issued in the proceedings. The adminis-
trative law judge is not required to 
provide a written explanation for rul-
ings on objections, procedural motions, 
and other matters not directly relevant 
to the substance of the initial decision. 
If the administrative law judge refers 
to any previous unreported or unpub-
lished initial decision, the administra-
tive law judge must make copies of 
that initial decision available to all 
parties and the FAA decisionmaker. 

(b) 

Oral decision. Except as provided 

in paragraph (c) of this section, at the 
conclusion of the hearing, the adminis-
trative law judge’s oral initial decision 
and order must be on the record. 

(c) 

Written decision. The administra-

tive law judge may issue a written ini-
tial decision not later than 30 days 
after the conclusion of the hearing or 
submission of the last post-hearing 
brief if the administrative law judge 
finds that issuing a written initial de-
cision is reasonable. The administra-
tive law judge must serve a copy of any 
written initial decision on each party. 

(d) 

Reconsideration of an initial deci-

sion.  The FAA decisionmaker may 
treat a motion for reconsideration of 
an initial decision as a notice of appeal 
under § 13.233, and if the motion was 
filed within the time allowed for the 
filing of a notice of appeal, the FAA de-
cisionmaker will issue a briefing sched-
ule, as provided in § 13.218. 

(e) 

Order assessing civil penalty. Unless 

appealed pursuant to § 13.233, the initial 
decision issued by the administrative 
law judge is considered an order assess-
ing civil penalty if the administrative 
law judge finds that an alleged viola-
tion occurred and determines that a 
civil penalty, in an amount found ap-
propriate by the administrative law 
judge, is warranted. The administra-
tive law judge may not assess a civil 
penalty exceeding the amount sought 
in the complaint. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00084

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR