background image

81 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

Pt. 14 

[84 FR 37068, July 31, 2019, as amended at 86 
FR 1753, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23249, May 3, 
2021; 87 FR 15863, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1122, 
Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 6971, Feb. 2, 2023; 88 FR 
89557, Dec. 28, 2023] 

Subpart I—Flight Operational 

Quality Assurance Programs 

§ 13.401

Flight Operational Quality As-

surance Program: Prohibition 
against use of data for enforcement 
purposes. 

(a) 

Applicability.  This section applies 

to any operator of an aircraft who op-
erates such aircraft under an approved 
Flight Operational Quality Assurance 
(FOQA) program. 

(b) 

Definitions. For the purpose of this 

section, the terms— 

(1) 

Flight Operational Quality Assur-

ance (FOQA) program means an FAA- 
approved program for the routine col-
lection and analysis of digital flight 
data gathered during aircraft oper-
ations, including data currently col-
lected pursuant to existing regulatory 
provisions, when such data is included 
in an approved FOQA program. 

(2) 

FOQA data means any digital 

flight data that has been collected 
from an individual aircraft pursuant to 
an FAA-approved FOQA program, re-
gardless of the electronic format of 
that data. 

(3) 

Aggregate FOQA data means the 

summary statistical indices that are 
associated with FOQA event cat-
egories, based on an analysis of FOQA 
data from multiple aircraft operations. 

(c) 

Requirements.  In order for para-

graph (e) of this section to apply, the 
operator must submit, maintain, and 
adhere to a FOQA Implementation and 
Operation Plan that is approved by the 
Administrator and which contains the 
following elements: 

(1) A description of the operator’s 

plan for collecting and analyzing flight 
recorded data from line operations on a 
routine basis, including identification 
of the data to be collected; 

(2) Procedures for taking corrective 

action that analysis of the data indi-
cates is necessary in the interest of 
safety; 

(3) Procedures for providing the FAA 

with aggregate FOQA data; 

(4) Procedures for informing the FAA 

as to any corrective action being un-

dertaken pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) 
of this section. 

(d) 

Submission of aggregate data. The 

operator will provide the FAA with ag-
gregate FOQA data in a form and man-
ner acceptable to the Administrator. 

(e) 

Enforcement.  Except for criminal 

or deliberate acts, the Administrator 
will not use an operator’s FOQA data 
or aggregate FOQA data in an enforce-
ment action against that operator or 
its employees when such FOQA data or 
aggregate FOQA data is obtained from 
a FOQA program that is approved by 
the Administrator. 

(f) 

Disclosure.  FOQA data and aggre-

gate FOQA data, if submitted in ac-
cordance with an order designating the 
information as protected under part 193 
of this chapter, will be afforded the 
nondisclosure protections of part 193 of 
this chapter. 

(g) 

Withdrawal of program approval. 

The Administrator may withdraw ap-
proval of a previously approved FOQA 
program for failure to comply with the 
requirements of this chapter. Grounds 
for withdrawal of approval may in-
clude, but are not limited to— 

(1) Failure to implement corrective 

action that analysis of available FOQA 
data indicates is necessary in the inter-
est of safety; or 

(2) Failure to correct a continuing 

pattern of violations following notice 
by the agency; or also 

(3) Willful misconduct or willful vio-

lation of the FAA regulations in this 
chapter. 

[Doc. No. FAA–2000–7554, 66 FR 55048, Oct. 31, 
2001; Amdt. 13–30, 67 FR 31401, May 9, 2002] 

PART 14—RULES IMPLEMENTING 

THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE 
ACT OF 1980 

Subpart A—General Provisions 

Sec. 
14.01

Purpose of these rules. 

14.02

Proceedings covered. 

14.03

Eligibility of applicants. 

14.04

Standards for awards. 

14.05

Allowance fees and expenses. 

Subpart B—Information Required From 

Applicants 

14.10

Contents of application. 

14.11

Net worth exhibit. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00091

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

82 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 14.01 

14.12

Documentation of fees and expenses. 

Subpart C—Procedures for Considering 

Applications 

14.20

When an application may be filed. 

14.21

Filing and service of documents. 

14.22

Answer to application. 

14.23

Reply. 

14.24

Comments by other parties. 

14.25

Settlement. 

14.26

Further proceedings. 

14.27

Decision. 

14.28

Review by FAA decisionmaker. 

14.29

Judicial review. 

14.30

Payment of award. 

A

UTHORITY

: 5 U.S.C. 504; 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 

40113, 46104 and 47122. 

S

OURCE

: Docket No. 25958, 54 FR 46199, Nov. 

1, 1989, unless otherwise noted. 

Subpart A—General Provisions 

§ 14.01

Purpose of these rules. 

The Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 

U.S.C. 504 (the Act), provides for the 
award of attorney fees and other ex-
penses to eligible individuals and enti-
ties who are parties to certain adminis-
trative proceedings (adversary adju-
dications) before the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA). An eligible 
party may receive an award when it 
prevails over the FAA, unless the agen-
cy’s position in the proceeding was sub-
stantially justified or special cir-
cumstances make an award unjust. The 
rules in this part describe the parties 
eligible for awards and the proceedings 
that are covered. They also explain 
how to apply for awards, and the proce-
dures and standards that the FAA De-
cisionmaker will use to make them. As 
used hereinafter, the term ‘‘agency’’ 
applies to the FAA. 

§ 14.02

Proceedings covered. 

(a) The Act applies to certain adver-

sary adjudications conducted by the 
FAA under 49 CFR part 17 and the Ac-
quisition Management System (AMS). 
These are adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 
554, in which the position of the FAA is 
represented by an attorney or other 
representative who enters an appear-
ance and participates in the pro-
ceeding. This subpart applies to pro-
ceedings under 49 U.S.C. 46301, 46302, 
and 46303 and to the Default Adjudica-

tive Process under part 17 of this chap-
ter and the AMS. 

(b) If a proceeding includes both mat-

ters covered by the Act and matters 
specifically excluded from coverage, 
any award made will include only fees 
and expenses related to covered issues. 

(c) Fees and other expenses may not 

be awarded to a party for any portion 
of the adversary adjudication in which 
such party has unreasonably pro-
tracted the proceedings. 

[54 FR 46199, Nov. 1, 1989, as amended by 
Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32935, June 18, 1999] 

§ 14.03

Eligibility of applicants. 

(a) To be eligible for an award of at-

torney fees and other expenses under 
the Act, the applicant must be a party 
to the adversary adjudication for which 
it seeks an award. The term ‘‘party’’ is 
defined in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(B) and 5 
U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show 
that it meets all conditions or eligi-
bility set out in this subpart. 

(b) The types of eligible applicants 

are as follows: 

(1) An individual with a net worth of 

not more than $2 million at the time 
the adversary adjudication was initi-
ated; 

(2) The sole owner of an unincor-

porated business who has a net worth 
of not more than $7 million, including 
both personal and business interests, 
and not more than 500 employees at the 
time the adversary adjudication was 
initiated; 

(3) A charitable or other tax-exempt 

organization described in section 
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
(26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 
500 employees at the time the adver-
sary adjudication was initiated; and 

(4) A cooperative association as de-

fined in section 15(a) of the Agricul-
tural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) 
with not more than 500 employees at 
the time the adversary adjudication 
was initiated; and 

(5) Any other partnership, corpora-

tion, association, or public or private 
organization with a net worth of not 
more than $7 million and not more 
than 500 employees at the time the ad-
versary adjudication was initiated. 

(c) For the purpose of eligibility, the 

net worth and number of employees of 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00092

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

83 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 14.05 

an applicant shall be determined as of 
the date the proceeding was initiated. 

(d) An applicant who owns an unin-

corporated business will be considered 
an ‘‘individual’’ rather than a ‘‘sole 
owner of an unincorporated business’’ 
if the issues on which the applicant 
prevails are related primarily to per-
sonal interests rather than to business 
interest. 

(e) The employees of an applicant in-

clude all persons who regularly per-
form services for remuneration for the 
applicant, under the applicant’s direc-
tion and control. Part-time employees 
shall be included on a proportional 
basis. 

(f) The net worth and number of em-

ployees of the applicant and all of its 
affiliates shall be aggregated to deter-
mine eligibility. Any individual, cor-
poration, or other entity that directly 
or indirectly controls or owns a major-
ity of the voting shares or other inter-
est of the applicant, or any corporation 
or other entity of which the applicant 
directly or indirectly owns or controls 
a majority of the voting shares or 
other interest, will be considered an af-
filiate for purposes of this part, unless 
the ALJ or adjudicative officer deter-
mines that such treatment would be 
unjust and contrary to the purposes of 
the Act in light of the actual relation-
ship between the affiliated entities. In 
addition, the ALJ or adjudicative offi-
cer may determine that financial rela-
tionships of the applicant, other than 
those described in this paragraph, con-
stitute special circumstances that 
would make an award unjust. 

(g) An applicant that participates in 

a proceeding primarily on behalf of one 
or more other persons or entities that 
would be ineligible if not itself eligible 
for an award. 

[54 FR 46199, Nov. 1, 1989, as amended by 
Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32935, June 18, 1999] 

§ 14.04

Standards for awards. 

(a) A prevailing applicant may re-

ceive an award for attorney fees and 
other expenses incurred in connection 
with a proceeding, or in a significant 
and discrete substantive portion of the 
proceeding, unless the position of the 
agency over which the applicant has 
prevailed was substantially justified. 
Whether or not the position of the FAA 

was substantially justified shall be de-
termined on the basis of the record (in-
cluding the record with respect to the 
action or failure to act by the agency 
upon which the civil action is based) 
which was made in the civil action for 
which fees and other expenses are 
sought. The burden of proof that an 
award should not be made to an eligi-
ble prevailing applicant is on the agen-
cy counsel, who may avoid an award by 
showing that the agency’s position was 
reasonable in law and fact. 

(b) An award will be reduced or de-

nied if the applicant has unduly or un-
reasonably protracted the proceeding 
or if special circumstances make the 
award sought unjust. 

§ 14.05

Allowance fees and expenses. 

(a) Awards will be based on rates cus-

tomarily charged by persons engaged 
in the business of acting as attorneys, 
agents, and expert witnesses, even if 
the services were made available with-
out charge or at a reduced rate to the 
applicant. 

(b) No award for the fee of an attor-

ney or agent under this part may ex-
ceed $125 per hour, or such rate as pre-
scribed by 5 U.S.C. 504. No award to 
compensate an expert witness may ex-
ceed the highest rate at which the 
agency pays expert witnesses. However, 
an award may also include the reason-
able expenses of the attorney, agent, or 
witness as a separate item, if the attor-
ney, agent, or witness ordinarily 
charges clients separately for such ex-
penses. 

(c) In determining the reasonableness 

of the fee sought for an attorney, 
agent, or expert witness, the ALJ or 
adjudicative officer shall consider the 
following: 

(1) If the attorney, agent, or witness 

is in private practice, his or her cus-
tomary fee for similar services, or if an 
employee of the applicant, the fully al-
located cost of the services; 

(2) The prevailing rate for similar 

services in the community in which the 
attorney, agent, or witness ordinarily 
performs services; 

(3) The time actually spent in the 

representation of the applicant; 

(4) The time reasonably spent in light 

of the difficulty or complexity of the 
issues in the proceeding; and 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00093

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

84 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 14.10 

(5) Such other factors as may bear on 

the value of the services provided. 

(d) The reasonable cost of any study, 

analysis, engineering report, test, 
project, or similar matter prepared on 
behalf of a party may be awarded, to 
the extent that the charge for the serv-
ice does not exceed the prevailing rate 
for similar services, and the study or 
other matter was necessary for prepa-
ration of the applicant’s case. 

(e) Fees may be awarded only for 

work performed after the issuance of a 
complaint, or in the Default Adjudica-
tive Process for a protest or contract 
dispute under part 17 of this chapter 
and the AMS. 

[Amdt. 13–18, 53 FR 34655, Sept. 7, 1988, as 
amended by Amdt. 14–1, 55 FR 15131, Apr. 20, 
1990; Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32935, June 18, 1999] 

Subpart B—Information Required 

From Applicants 

§ 14.10

Contents of application. 

(a) An application for an award of 

fees and expenses under the Act shall 
identify the applicant and the pro-
ceeding for which an award is sought. 
The application shall show that the ap-
plicant has prevailed and identify the 
position of the agency in the pro-
ceeding that the applicant alleges was 
not substantially justified. Unless the 
applicant is an individual, the applica-
tion shall also state the number of em-
ployees of the applicant and describe 
briefly the type and purpose of its or-
ganization or business. 

(b) The application shall also include 

a statement that the applicant’s net 
worth does not exceed $2 million (if an 
individual) or $7 million (for all other 
applicants, including their affiliates) 
at the time the adversary adjudication 
was initiated. However, an applicant 
may omit this statement if: 

(1) It attaches a copy of a ruling by 

the Internal Revenue Service that it 
qualifies as an organization described 
in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)), or in the 
case of a tax-exempt organization not 
required to obtain a ruling from the In-
ternal Revenue Service on its exempt 
status, a statement that describes the 
basis for the applicant’s belief that it 
qualifies under such section; or 

(2) It states that it is a cooperative 

association as defined in section 15(a) 
of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1141j(a)). 

(c) The application shall state the 

amount of fees and expenses for which 
an award is sought. 

(d) The application may also include 

any other matters that the applicant 
wishes this agency to consider in deter-
mining whether and in what amount an 
award should be made. 

(e) The application shall be signed by 

the applicant or an authorized officer 
or attorney for the applicant. It shall 
also contain or be accompanied by a 
written verification under oath or 
under penalty of perjury that the infor-
mation provided in the application is 
true and correct. 

(f) If the applicant is a partnership, 

corporation, association, organization, 
or sole owner of an unincorporated 
business, the application shall state 
that the applicant did not have more 
than 500 employees at the time the ad-
versary adjudication was initiated, giv-
ing the number of its employees and 
describing briefly the type and purpose 
of its organization or business. 

§ 14.11

Net worth exhibit. 

(a) Each applicant except a qualified 

tax-exempt organization or cooperative 
association must provide with its ap-
plication a detailed exhibit showing 
the net worth of the applicant and any 
affiliates when the proceeding was ini-
tiated. If any individual, corporation, 
or other entity directly or indirectly 
controls or owns a majority of the vot-
ing shares or other interest of the ap-
plicant, or if the applicant directly or 
indirectly owns or controls a majority 
of the voting shares or other interest of 
any corporation or other entity, the 
exhibit must include a showing of the 
net worth of all such affiliates or of the 
applicant including the affiliates. The 
exhibit may be in any form convenient 
to the applicant that provides full dis-
closure of the applicant’s and its affili-
ates’ assets and liabilities and is suffi-
cient to determine whether the appli-
cant qualifies under the standards in 
this part. The administrative law judge 
may require an applicant to file addi-
tional information to determine the 
eligibility for an award. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00094

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

85 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 14.21 

(b) The net worth exhibit shall de-

scribe any transfers of assets from, or 
obligations incurred by, the applicant 
or any affiliate, occurring in the one- 
year period prior to the date on which 
the proceeding was initiated, that re-
duced the net worth of the applicant 
and its affiliates below the applicable 
net worth ceiling. If there were no such 
transactions, the applicant shall so 
state. 

(c) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit 

will be included in the public record of 
the proceeding. However, an applicant 
that objects to public disclosure of the 
net worth exhibit, or any part of it, 
may submit that portion of the exhibit 
directly to the ALJ or adjudicative of-
ficer in a sealed envelope labeled 
‘‘Confidential Financial Information,’’ 
accompanied by a motion to withhold 
the information. 

(1) The motion shall describe the in-

formation sought to be withheld and 
explain, in detail, why it should be ex-
empt under applicable law or regula-
tion, why public disclosure would ad-
versely affect the applicant, and why 
disclosure is not required in the public 
interest. 

(2) The net worth exhibit shall be 

served on the FAA counsel, but need 
not be served on any other party to the 
proceeding. 

(3) If the ALJ or adjudicative officer 

finds that the net worth exhibit, or any 
part of it, should not be withheld from 
disclosure, it shall be placed in the 
public record of the proceeding. Other-
wise, any request to inspect or copy 
the exhibit shall be disposed of in ac-
cordance with the FAA’s established 
procedures. 

[54 FR 46199, Nov. 1, 1989, as amended by 
Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32935, June 18, 1999] 

§ 14.12

Documentation of fees and ex-

penses. 

The application shall be accompanied 

by full documentation of the fees and 
expenses, including the cost of any 
study, analysis, engineering report, 
test, project or similar matter, for 
which an award is sought. A separate 
itemized statement shall be submitted 
for each professional firm or individual 
whose services are covered by the ap-
plication, showing the hours spent in 
connection with the proceedings by 

each individual, a description of the 
specific services performed, the rate at 
which each fee has been computed, any 
expenses for which reimbursement is 
sought, the total amount claimed, and 
the total amount paid or payable by 
the applicant or by any other person or 
entity for the services provided. The 
administrative law judge may require 
the applicant to provide vouchers, re-
ceipts, or other substantiation for any 
expenses claimed. 

Subpart C—Procedures for 

Considering Applications 

§ 14.20

When an application may be 

filed. 

(a) An application may be filed when-

ever the applicant has prevailed in the 
proceeding, but in no case later than 30 
days after the FAA Decisionmaker’s 
final disposition of the proceeding, or 
service of the order of the Adminis-
trator in a proceeding under the AMS. 

(b) If review or reconsideration is 

sought or taken of a decision to which 
an applicant believes it has prevailed, 
proceedings for the award of fees shall 
be stayed pending final disposition of 
the underlying controversy. 

(c) For purposes of this part, final 

disposition means the later of: 

(1) Under part 17 of this chapter and 

the AMS, the date on which the order 
of the Administrator is served; 

(2) The date on which an unappealed 

initial decision becomes administra-
tively final; 

(3) Issuance of an order disposing of 

any petitions for reconsideration of the 
FAA Decisionmaker’s final order in the 
proceeding; 

(4) If no petition for reconsideration 

is filed, the last date on which such a 
petition could have been filed; or 

(5) Issuance of a final order or any 

other final resolution of a proceeding, 
such as a settlement or voluntary dis-
missal, which is not subject to a peti-
tion for reconsideration. 

[54 FR 46199, Nov. 1, 1989, as amended by 
Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 1999] 

§ 14.21

Filing and service of docu-

ments. 

Any application for an award or 

other pleading or document related to 
an application shall be filed and served 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00095

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

86 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 14.22 

on all parties to the proceeding in the 
same manner as other pleadings in the 
proceeding, except as provided in 
§ 14.11(b) for confidential financial in-
formation. Where the proceeding was 
held under part 17 of this chapter and 
the AMS, the application shall be filed 
with the FAA’s attorney and with the 
Office of Dispute Resolution for Acqui-
sition. 

[Doc. No. FAA–1998–4379, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 
1999] 

§ 14.22

Answer to application. 

(a) Within 30 days after service of an 

application, counsel representing the 
agency against which an award is 
sought may file an answer to the appli-
cation. Unless agency counsel requests 
an extension of time for filing or files 
a statement of intent to negotiate 
under paragraph (b) of the section, fail-
ure to file an answer within the 30-day 
period may be treated as a consent to 
the award requested. 

(b) If the FAA’s counsel and the ap-

plicant believe that the issues in the 
fee application can be settled, they 
may jointly file a statement of their 
intent to negotiate a settlement. The 
filing of this statement shall extend 
the time for filing an answer for an ad-
ditional 30 days, and further extensions 
may be granted by the ALJ or adju-
dicative officer upon request by the 
FAA’s counsel and the applicant. 

(c) The answer shall explain in detail 

any objections to the award requested 
and identify the facts relied on in sup-
port of agency counsel’s position. If the 
answer is based on any alleged facts 
not already in the record of the pro-
ceeding, agency counsel shall include 
with the answer either supporting affi-
davits or a request for further pro-
ceedings under § 14.26. 

[54 FR 46199, Nov. 1, 1989, as amended by 
Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 1999] 

§ 14.23

Reply. 

Within 15 days after service of an an-

swer, the applicant may file a reply. If 
the reply is based on any alleged facts 
not already in the record of the pro-
ceeding, the applicant shall include 
with the reply either supporting affida-
vits or a request for further pro-
ceedings under § 14.26. 

§ 14.24

Comments by other parties. 

Any party to a proceeding other than 

the applicant and the FAA’s counsel 
may file comments on an application 
within 30 days after it is served, or on 
an answer within 15 days after it is 
served. A commenting party may not 
participate further in proceedings on 
the application unless the ALJ or adju-
dicative officer determines that the 
public interest requires such participa-
tion in order to permit full exploration 
of matters raised in the comments. 

[Doc. No. FAA–1998–4379, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 
1999] 

§ 14.25

Settlement. 

The applicant and agency counsel 

may agree on a proposed settlement of 
the award before final action on the ap-
plication, either in connection with a 
settlement of the underlying pro-
ceeding, or after the underlying pro-
ceeding has been concluded. If a pre-
vailing party and agency counsel agree 
on a proposed settlement of an award 
before an application has been filed, 
the application shall be filed with the 
proposed settlement. 

§ 14.26

Further proceedings. 

(a) Ordinarily the determination of 

an award will be made on the basis of 
the written record; however, on request 
of either the applicant or agency coun-
sel, or on his or her own initiative, the 
ALJ or adjudicative officer assigned to 
the matter may order further pro-
ceedings, such as an informal con-
ference, oral argument, additional 
written submissions, or an evidentiary 
hearing. Such further proceedings shall 
be held only when necessary for full 
and fair resolution of the issues arising 
from the application and shall be con-
ducted as promptly as possible. 

(b) A request that the administrative 

law judge order further proceedings 
under this section shall specifically 
identify the information sought or the 
disputed issues and shall explain why 
the additional proceedings are nec-
essary to resolve the issues. 

[54 FR 46199, Nov. 1, 1989, as amended by 
Amdt. 14–03, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 1999] 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00096

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

87 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 14.30 

§ 14.27

Decision. 

(a) The ALJ shall issue an initial de-

cision on the application within 60 days 
after completion of proceedings on the 
application. 

(b) An adjudicative officer in a pro-

ceeding under part 17 of this chapter 
and the AMS shall prepare a findings 
and recommendations for the Office of 
Dispute Resolution for Acquisition. 

(c) A decision under paragraph (a) or 

(b) of this section shall include written 
findings and conclusions on the appli-
cant’s eligibility and status as pre-
vailing party and an explanation of the 
reasons for any difference between the 
amount requested and the amount 
awarded. The decision shall also in-
clude, if at issue, findings on whether 
the FAA’s position was substantially 
justified, or whether special cir-
cumstances make an award unjust. 

[Doc. No. FAA–1998–4379, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 
1999] 

§ 14.28

Review by FAA decisionmaker. 

(a) In proceedings other than those 

under part 17 of this chapter and the 
AMS, either the applicant or the FAA 
counsel may seek review of the initial 
decision on the fee application in ac-
cordance with subpart G of part 13 of 
this chapter, specifically § 13.233. Addi-
tionally, the FAA Decisionmaker may 
decide to review the decision on his/her 
own initiative. If neither the applicant 
nor the FAA’s counsel seeks review 
within 30 days after the decision is 
issued, it shall become final. Whether 
to review a decision is a matter within 
the discretion of the FAA Decision-
maker. If review is taken, the FAA De-
cisionmaker will issue a final decision 
on the application or remand the appli-
cation to the ALJ who issue the initial 
fee award determination for further 
proceedings. 

(b) In proceedings under part 17 of 

this chapter and the AMS, the adju-
dicative officer shall prepare findings 
and recommendations for the Office of 
Dispute Resolution for Acquisition 
with recommendations as to whether 
or not an award should be made, the 
amount of the award, and the reasons 
therefor. The Office of Dispute Resolu-
tion for Acquisition shall submit a rec-
ommended order to the Administrator 

after the completion of all submissions 
related to the EAJA application. Upon 
the Administrator’s action, the order 
shall become final, and may be re-
viewed under 49 U.S.C. 46110. 

[Doc. No. FAA–1998–4379, 64 FR 32936, June 18, 
1999, as amended at 70 FR 8238, Feb. 18, 2005] 

§ 14.29

Judicial review. 

If an applicant is dissatisfied with 

the determination of fees and other ex-
penses made under this subsection, 
pursuant 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2), that appli-
cant may, within thirty (30) days after 
the determination is made, appeal the 
determination to the court of the 
United States having jurisdiction to re-
view the merits of the underlying deci-
sion of the FAA adversary adjudica-
tion. The court’s determination on any 
appeal heard under this paragraph 
shall be based solely on the factual 
record made before the FAA. The court 
may modify the determination of fees 
and other expenses only if the court 
finds that the failure to make an award 
of fees and other expenses, or the cal-
culation of the amount of the award, 
was unsupported by substantial evi-
dence. 

§ 14.30

Payment of award. 

An applicant seeking payment of an 

award shall submit to the disbursing 
official of the FAA a copy of the FAA 
Decisionmaker’s final decision grant-
ing the award, accompanied by a state-
ment that the applicant will not seek 
review of the decision in the United 
States courts. Applications for award 
grants in cases involving the FAA shall 
be sent to: The Office of Accounting 
and Audit, AAA–1, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Ave-
nue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. The 
agency will pay the amount awarded to 
the applicant within 60 days, unless ju-
dicial review of the award or of the un-
derlying decision of the adversary ad-
judication has been sought by the ap-
plicant or any other party to the pro-
ceeding. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00097

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR