689
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 151.13
standard configuration, length, and
property interests, considering all facts
presented by the airport owner or oper-
ator. Any development that improves a
specific runway or landing strip is con-
sidered to be a runway improvement,
including runway lighting and the de-
veloping or lighting of taxiways serv-
ing a runway.
(e) On existing airports where sub-
stantial improvements are made that
do not benefit a specific runway or
landing strip, such as overall grading
or drainage, terminal area or building
developments, the sponsor must own,
acquire, or agree to acquire adequate
property interests in runway clear zone
areas for the dominant runway or land-
ing strip to the extent that the Admin-
istrator determines is practical and
feasible, with regard to standard con-
figuration, length, and property inter-
ests, considering all facts presented by
the airport owner or operator.
(f) If a sponsor or other public agency
shows that it is legally able to prevent
the future erection or creation of ob-
structions in the runway clear zone
area, and adopts protective measures
to prohibit their future erection or cre-
ation, that showing is acceptable for
the purposes of paragraphs (d) and (e)
of this section in place of an adequate
property interest (except for rights re-
quired for removing existing obstruc-
tions). In such a case, there must be an
agreement between the FAA and the
sponsor for removing or marking or
lighting (to be determined in each
case) any existing obstruction to air
navigation In each case, the sponsor
must furnish information as to the spe-
cific height limitations established and
as to the current and foreseeable future
use of the property to which they
apply. The information must include
an acceptable legal opinion of the va-
lidity of the measures adopted, includ-
ing a conclusion that the height limi-
tations are not unreasonable in view of
current and foreseeable future use of
the property, and are a reasonable ex-
ercise of the police power, together
with the reasons or basis supporting
the opinion.
(g) The authority exercised by the
Administrator under paragraphs (b),
(c), (d), and (e) of this section to allow
a deviation from, or the extent of con-
formity to, standard configuration or
length of runway clear zones, or to de-
termine the adequacy of property in-
terests therein, is also exercised by Re-
gional Directors.
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12350, Dec. 13, 1962, as
amended by Amdt. 151–22, 33 FR 8267, June 4,
1968; Amdt. 151–25, 33 FR 14535, Sept. 27, 1968]
§ 151.13 Federal-aid Airport Program:
Policy affecting landing aid re-
quirements.
(a)
Landing aid requirements.
No
project for developing or improving an
airport may be approved for the Pro-
gram unless it provides for acquiring or
installing such of the following landing
aids as the Administrator determines
are needed for the safe and efficient use
of the airport by aircraft, considering
the category of the airport and the
type and volume of traffic using it:
(1) Land needed for installing ap-
proach lighting systems (ALS).
(2) In-runway lighting.
(3) High intensity runway lighting.
(4) Runway distance markers.
For the purposes of this section ‘‘ap-
proach lighting system (ALS)’’ is a
standard configuration of aeronautical
ground lights in the approach area to a
runway or channel to assist a pilot in
making an approach to the runway or
channel.
(b)
Specific landing aid requirements.
The landing aids set forth in para-
graphs (a) (1) through (4) of this section
are required for the safe and efficient
use of airports by aircraft in the fol-
lowing cases:
(1) Lands for installing approach
lighting systems are required as part of
a project if the installing of the compo-
nents of the system on the airport is in
an approved FAA budget, unless the
sponsor has already acquired the land
necessary for the system or is other-
wise undertaking to acquire that land.
If the sponsor is otherwise undertaking
to acquire the land, the grant agree-
ment for the project must obligate the
sponsor to complete the acquisition
within a time limit prescribed by the
Administrator. The Administrator im-
mediately notifies a sponsor when a
budget is approved providing for in-
stalling an approach lighting system at
the airport concerned.
690
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition)
§ 151.15
(2) In-runway lighting is required as
part of a project:
(i) If the project includes:
(
a
) Construction of a new runway
designated by the FAA as an instru-
ment landing runway for which the in-
stallation of an IFR precision approach
system including ALS and ILS, has
been programmed by the FAA with
funds then available therefor;
(
b
) An extension of 3,000 feet or more
(usable for landing purposes) of the ap-
proach end of a designated instrument
landing runway equipped, or programed
by the FAA, with funds then available
therefor, to be equipped, with an IFR
precision approach system including
ALS and ILS;
(
c
) Reconstruction of a designated in-
strument landing runway equipped, or
programed by the FAA, with funds
then available therefor, to be equipped
with an IFR precision approach system
including ALS and ILS, if the recon-
struction requires the closing of the
runway; or
(
d
) Any other airport development on
an airport whose designated instru-
ment landing runway is equipped, or
programed by the FAA, with funds
then available therefor, to be equipped
with an IFR precision approach system
including ALS and ILS; and
(ii) Only if a study of the airport
shows that in-runway lighting is re-
quired for the safe and efficient use of
the airport by aircraft, after the Ad-
ministrator considers the following:
(
a
) The type and volume of flight ac-
tivity;
(
b
) Other existing or planned naviga-
tional aids;
(
c
) Airport environmental factors
such as local weather conditions and
adjacent geographic profiles;
(
d
) Approach and departure paths;
(
e
) Effect on landing and takeoff
minima; and
(
f
) In the case of projects under para-
graph (b)(2)(i)(
d
) of this section, wheth-
er installing in-runway lighting re-
quires closing the runway for so long a
time that the adverse effect on safety
of its closing would outweigh the con-
tribution to safety that would be
gained by the in-runway lights or
whether it would unduly interfere with
the efficiency of aircraft operations.
(3) High intensity runway edge light-
ing on the designated instrument land-
ing runway is required as a part of a
project whenever that runway is
equipped or programmed for the instal-
lation of an ILS and high intensity
runway edge lights are not then in-
stalled on the runway or included in
another project. A project for extend-
ing a runway that has high intensity
runway edge lights on the existing run-
way requires, as a part of the project,
the extension of the high intensity run-
way edge lights.
(4) Runway distance markers whose
design standards have been approved
and published by the FAA are required
as a part of a project on a case-by-case
basis if, after reviewing the pertinent
facts and circumstances of the case,
the Administrator determines that
they are needed for the safe and effi-
cient use of the airport by aircraft.
[Doc. No. 1329, 27 FR 12350, Dec. 13, 1962, as
amended by Amdt. 151–3, 28 FR 12613, Nov. 27,
1963; Amdt. 151–33, 34 FR 9708, June 21, 1969]
§ 151.15 Federal-aid Airport Program:
Policy affecting runway or taxiway
remarking.
No project for developing or improv-
ing an airport may be approved for the
Program unless it provides for runway
or taxiway remarking if the present
marking is obliterated by construction,
alteration or repair work included in a
FAAP project or by the required rout-
ing of construction equipment used
therein.
[Amdt. 151–17, 31 FR 16524, Dec. 28, 1966]
Subpart B—Rules and Procedures
for Airport Development Projects
A
UTHORITY
: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 47151,
47153.
S
OURCE
: Docket No. 1329, 27 FR 12351, Dec.
13, 1962, unless otherwise noted.
§ 151.21 Procedures: Application; gen-
eral information.
(a) An eligible sponsor that desires to
obtain Federal aid for eligible airport
development must submit to the Area
Manager of the area in which the spon-
sor is located (hereinafter in this part
referred to as the ‘‘Area Manager’’), a