background image

103 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 16.103 

(c) In the cases described in para-

graph (b) of this section, within 30 days 
after the date of service of the initial 
determination, a party adversely af-
fected by the Director’s Determination 
may file in accordance with § 16.13 and 
serve in accordance with § 16.15 a simul-
taneous Notice of Appeal and Brief. 

(d) A reply to an appeal brief may be 

filed within 20 days after the date of 
service of the appeal. 

(e) On appeal, the Associate Adminis-

trator will consider the issues ad-
dressed in any order on a motion to 
dismiss or motion for summary judg-
ment and any issues accepted in the 
Director’s Determination using the fol-
lowing analysis: 

(1) Are the findings of fact each sup-

ported by a preponderance of reliable, 
probative, and substantial evidence 
contained in the record? 

(2) Are conclusions made in accord-

ance with law, precedent and policy? 

(3) Are the questions on appeal sub-

stantial? 

(4) Have any prejudicial errors oc-

curred? 

(f) Any new issues or evidence pre-

sented in an appeal or reply will not be 
considered unless accompanied by a pe-
tition and good cause found as to why 
the new issue or evidence was not pre-
sented to the Director. Such a petition 
must: 

(1) Set forth the new matter; 
(2) Contain affidavits of prospective 

witnesses, authenticated documents, or 
both, or an explanation of why such 
substantiation is unavailable; and 

(3) Contain a statement explaining 

why such new issue or evidence could 
not have been discovered in the exer-
cise of due diligence prior to the date 
on which the evidentiary record closed. 

(g) The Associate Administrator will 

issue a final decision and order within 
60 days after the due date of the reply. 

(h) If no appeal is filed within the 

time period specified in paragraph (c) 
of this section, the Director’s Deter-
mination becomes the final decision 
and order of the FAA without further 
action. A Director’s Determination 
that becomes final, because there is no 
administrative appeal, is not judicially 
reviewable. 

(i) No requests for rehearing, reargu-

ment, reconsideration, or modification 

of a final order will be considered with-
out a finding of good cause. 

[Amdt. 16–1, 78 FR 56145, Sept. 12, 2013] 

§ 16.34

Consent orders. 

(a) The parties may agree at any 

time before the issuance of a final 
agency decision to dispose of the case 
by proposing a consent order. Good 
faith efforts to resolve a complaint 
through issuance of a consent order 
may continue throughout the adminis-
trative process. However, except as 
provided in § 16.11(a), such efforts may 
not serve as the basis for extensions of 
the times set forth in this part. 

(b) A proposal for a consent order, 

specified in paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion, shall include: 

(1) A proposed consent order; 
(2) An admission of all jurisdictional 

facts; and 

(3) An express waiver of the right to 

further procedural steps and of all 
rights of judicial review. 

(c) If the parties agree to dispose of a 

case by issuance of a consent order be-
fore the FAA issues a Director’s Deter-
mination, the proposal for a consent 
order is submitted jointly by the par-
ties to the Director, together with a re-
quest to adopt the consent order and 
dismiss the case. The Director may 
issue the consent order as an order of 
the FAA and terminate the proceeding. 

[Amdt. 16–1, 78 FR 56145, Sept. 12, 2013] 

Subpart D—Special Rules Applica-

ble to Proceedings Initiated 
by the FAA 

§ 16.101

Basis for the initiation of 

agency action. 

The FAA may initiate its own inves-

tigation of any matter within the ap-
plicability of this part without having 
received a complaint. The investiga-
tion may include, without limitation, 
any of the actions described in 
§ 16.29(b). 

§ 16.103

Notice of investigation. 

Following the initiation of an inves-

tigation under § 16.101, the FAA sends a 
notice to the person(s) subject to inves-
tigation. The notice will set forth the 
areas of the agency’s concern and the 
reasons therefor; request a response to 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00113

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

104 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 16.105 

the notice within 30 days of the date of 
service; and inform the respondent that 
the FAA will, in its discretion, invite 
good faith efforts to resolve the mat-
ter. 

§ 16.105

Failure to resolve informally. 

If the matters addressed in the FAA 

notices are not resolved informally, the 
FAA may issue a Director’s Determina-
tion under § 16.31. 

[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as 
amended at Amdt. 16–1, 78 FR 56146, Sept. 12, 
2013] 

Subpart E—Proposed Orders of 

Compliance 

§ 16.109

Orders terminating eligibility 

for grants, cease and desist orders, 
and other compliance orders. 

(a) The agency will provide the op-

portunity for a hearing if, in the Direc-
tor’s determination, the agency issues 
or proposes to issue an order termi-
nating eligibility for grants pursuant 
to 49 U.S.C. 47106(d), an order sus-
pending the payment of grant funds 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 47111(d); an order 
withholding approval of any new appli-
cation to impose a passenger facility 
charge pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 47111(e); a 
cease and desist order; an order direct-
ing the refund of fees unlawfully col-
lected; or any other compliance order 
issued by the Administrator to carry 
out the provisions of the Acts, and re-
quired to be issued after notice and op-
portunity for a hearing. In cases in 
which a hearing is not required by stat-
ute, the FAA may provide opportunity 
for a hearing at its discretion. 

(b) In a case in which the agency pro-

vides the opportunity for a hearing, the 
Director’s Determination issued under 
§ 16.31 will include a statement of the 
availability of a hearing under subpart 
F of this part. 

(1) Within 20 days after service of a 

Director’s Determination under § 16.31 
that provides an opportunity for a 
hearing a person subject to the pro-
posed compliance order may— 

(i) Request a hearing under subpart F 

of this part; 

(ii) Waive hearing and appeal the Di-

rector’s Determination in writing, as 
provided in § 16.33; 

(iii) File, jointly with a complainant, 

a motion to withdraw the complaint 
and to dismiss the proposed compliance 
action; or 

(iv) Submit, jointly with the agency, 

a proposed consent order under 
§ 16.34(c). 

(2) If the respondent fails to file an 

appeal in writing within the time peri-
ods provided in paragraph (c) of this 
section, the Director’s Determination 
becomes final. 

(c) The Director may either direct 

the respondent to submit a Corrective 
Action Plan or initiate proceedings to 
revoke and/or deny the respondent’s 
application for Airport Improvement 
Program discretionary grants under 49 
U.S.C. 47115 and general aviation air-
port grants under 49 U.S.C. 47114(d) 
when a Director’s Determination finds 
a respondent in noncompliance and 
does not provide for a hearing. 

(d) In the event that the respondent 

fails to submit, in accordance with a 
Director’s Determination, a Corrective 
Action Plan acceptable to the FAA 
within the time provided, unless ex-
tended by the FAA for good cause, and/ 
or if the respondent fails to complete 
the Corrective Action Plan as specified 
therein, the Director may initiate ac-
tion to revoke and/or deny applications 
for Airport Improvement Program dis-
cretionary grants under 49 U.S.C. 47115 
and general aviation airport grants 
under 49 U.S.C. 47114(d). 

(e) For those violations that cannot 

be remedied through corrective action, 
the Director may initiate action to re-
voke and/or deny the respondent’s ap-
plications for Airport Improvement 
Program discretionary grants under 49 
U.S.C. 47115 and general aviation air-
port grants under 49 U.S.C. 47114(d). 

(f) When the Director concludes that 

the respondent has fully complied with 
the Corrective Action Plan and/or when 
the Director determines that the re-
spondent has corrected the areas of 
noncompliance, the Director will ter-
minate the proceeding. 

(g) A complainant’s standing termi-

nates upon the issuance of a Director’s 
Determination that finds a respondent 
in noncompliance on all identified 
issues. The complainant may not ap-
peal the Director’s Determination if 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00114

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR