802
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition)
§ 161.311
new notice in accordance with the pro-
cedures in § 161.303 or, alternatively,
the procedures in § 161.321. These re-
quirements apply to substantial
changes that are not encompassed in
submitted alternative restriction pro-
posals and their analyses. A substan-
tial change to a restriction includes,
but is not limited to, any proposal that
would increase the burden on any avia-
tion user class.
(c) In addition to the information in
§ 161.303(c), a new notice must indicate
that the applicant is revising a pre-
vious notice, provide the reason for
making the revision, and provide a new
effective date (if any) for the restric-
tion.
(d) If substantial changes requiring a
new notice are made during the FAA’s
180-day review of the proposed restric-
tion, the applicant submitting the pro-
posed restriction shall notify the FAA
in writing that it is withdrawing its
proposal from the review process until
it has completed additional analysis,
public review, and documentation of
the public review. Resubmission to the
FAA will restart the 180-day review.
§ 161.311 Application procedure for ap-
proval of proposed restriction.
Each applicant proposing a Stage 3
restriction shall submit to the FAA the
following information for each restric-
tion and alternative restriction sub-
mitted, with a request that the FAA
review and approve the proposed Stage
3 noise or access restriction:
(a) A summary of evidence of the ful-
fillment of conditions for approval, as
specified in § 161.305;
(b) An analysis as specified in
§ 161.305, as appropriate to the proposed
restriction;
(c) A statement that the entity sub-
mitting the proposal is the party em-
powered to implement the restriction,
or is submitting the proposal on behalf
of such party; and
(d) A statement as to whether the
airport requests, in the event of dis-
approval of the proposed restriction or
any alternatives, that the FAA approve
any portion of the restriction or any
alternative that meets the statutory
requirements for approval. An appli-
cant requesting partial approval of any
proposal should indicate its priorities
as to portions of the proposal to be ap-
proved.
§ 161.313 Review of application.
(a)
Determination of completeness.
The
FAA, within 30 days of receipt of an ap-
plication, will determine whether the
application is complete in accordance
with § 161.311. Determinations of com-
pleteness will be made on all proposed
restrictions and alternatives. This
completeness determination is not an
approval or disapproval of the proposed
restriction.
(b)
Process for complete application.
When the FAA determines that a com-
plete application has been submitted,
the following procedures apply:
(1) The FAA notifies the applicant
that it intends to act on the proposed
restriction and publishes notice of the
proposed restriction in the F
EDERAL
R
EGISTER
in accordance with § 161.315.
The 180-day period for approving or dis-
approving the proposed restriction will
start on the date of original FAA re-
ceipt of the application.
(2) Following review of the applica-
tion, public comments, and any other
information obtained under § 161.317(b),
the FAA will issue a decision approving
or disapproving the proposed restric-
tion. This decision is a final decision of
the Administrator for purpose of judi-
cial review.
(c)
Process for incomplete application.
If the FAA determines that an applica-
tion is not complete with respect to
any submitted restriction or alter-
native restriction, the following proce-
dures apply:
(1) The FAA shall notify the appli-
cant in writing, returning the applica-
tion and setting forth the type of infor-
mation and analysis needed to com-
plete the application in accordance
with § 161.311.
(2) Within 30 days after the receipt of
this notice, the applicant shall advise
the FAA in writing whether or not it
intends to resubmit and supplement its
application.
(3) If the applicant does not respond
in 30 days, or advises the FAA that it
does not intend to resubmit and/or sup-
plement the application, the applica-
tion will be denied. This closes the
803
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 161.317
matter without prejudice to later ap-
plication and does not constitute dis-
approval of the proposed restriction.
(4) If the applicant chooses to resub-
mit and supplement the application,
the following procedures apply:
(i) Upon receipt of the resubmitted
application, the FAA determines
whether the application, as supple-
mented, is complete as set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(ii) If the application is complete, the
procedures set forth in § 161.315 shall be
followed. The 180-day review period
starts on the date of receipt of the last
supplement to the application.
(iii) If the application is still not
complete with respect to the proposed
restriction or at least one submitted
alternative, the FAA so advises the ap-
plicant as set forth in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section and provides the appli-
cant with an additional opportunity to
supplement the application as set forth
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
(iv) If the environmental documenta-
tion (either an environmental assess-
ment or information supporting a cat-
egorical exclusion) is incomplete, the
FAA will so notify the applicant in
writing, returning the application and
setting forth the types of information
and analysis needed to complete the
documentation. The FAA will continue
to return an application until adequate
environmental documentation is pro-
vided. When the application is deter-
mined to be complete, including the
environmental documentation, the 180-
day period for approval or disapproval
will begin upon receipt of the last sup-
plement to the application.
(v) Following review of the applica-
tion and its supplements, public com-
ments, and any other information ob-
tained under § 161.317(b), the FAA will
issue a decision approving or dis-
approving the application. This deci-
sion is a final decision of the Adminis-
trator for the purpose of judicial re-
view.
(5) The FAA will deny the application
and return it to the applicant if:
(i) None of the proposals submitted
are found to be complete;
(ii) The application has been returned
twice to the applicant for reasons other
than completion of the environmental
documentation; and
(iii) The applicant declines to com-
plete the application. This closes the
matter without prejudice to later ap-
plication, and does not constitute dis-
approval of the proposed restriction.
§ 161.315 Receipt of complete applica-
tion.
(a) When a complete application has
been received, the FAA will notify the
applicant by letter that the FAA in-
tends to act on the application.
(b) The FAA will publish notice of
the proposed restriction in the F
ED
-
ERAL
R
EGISTER
, inviting interested par-
ties to file comments on the applica-
tion within 30 days after publication of
the F
EDERAL
R
EGISTER
notice.
§ 161.317 Approval or disapproval of
proposed restriction.
(a) Upon determination that an appli-
cation is complete with respect to at
least one of the proposals submitted by
the applicant, the FAA will act upon
the complete proposals in the applica-
tion. The FAA will not act on any pro-
posal for which the applicant has de-
clined to submit additional necessary
information.
(b) The FAA will review the appli-
cant’s proposals in the preference order
specified by the applicant. The FAA
may request additional information
from aircraft operators, or any other
party, and may convene an informal
meeting to gather facts relevant to its
determination.
(c) The FAA will evaluate the pro-
posal and issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed restriction
and any submitted alternatives, in
whole or in part, in the order of pref-
erence indicated by the applicant. Once
the FAA approves a proposed restric-
tion, the FAA will not consider any
proposals of lower applicant-stated
preference. Approval or disapproval
will be given by the FAA within 180
days after receipt of the application or
last supplement thereto under § 161.313.
The FAA will publish its decision in
the F
EDERAL
R
EGISTER
and notify the
applicant in writing.
(d) The applicant’s failure to provide
substantial evidence supporting the
statutory conditions for approval of a
particular proposal is grounds for dis-
approval of that proposed restriction.