807
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 161.413
(b) The aircraft operator’s analysis
shall be made available for public re-
view under the procedures in § 161.407
and shall include the following:
(1) A copy of the restriction or the
language of the agreement as incor-
porated in a local ordinance, airport
rule, lease, or other document;
(2) The aircraft operator’s status
under the restriction (e.g., currently
affected operator, potential new en-
trant) and an explanation of the air-
craft operator’s specific objection to
the restriction;
(3) The quantified change in the noise
environment using methodology speci-
fied in this part;
(4) Evidence of the relationship be-
tween this change and the likelihood
that the restriction does not meet one
or more of the conditions in § 161.305;
and
(5) Sufficient data and analysis se-
lected from § 161.305, as applicable to
the restriction at issue, to support the
contention made in paragraph (b)(4) of
this section. This is to include either
an adequate environmental assessment
of the impacts of discontinuing all or
part of a restriction in accordance with
the aircraft operator’s petition, or ade-
quate information supporting a cat-
egorical exclusion under FAA orders
implementing the National Environ-
mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321).
(c) The amount of analysis may vary
with the complexity of the restriction,
the number and nature of the condi-
tions in § 161.305 that are alleged to be
unsupported, and the amount of pre-
vious analysis developed in support of
the restriction. The aircraft operator
may incorporate analysis previously
developed in support of the restriction,
including previous environmental doc-
umentation to the extent applicable.
The applicant is responsible for pro-
viding substantial evidence, as de-
scribed in § 161.305, that one or more of
the conditions are not supported.
§ 161.411 Comment by interested par-
ties.
(a) Each aircraft operator requesting
a reevaluation shall establish a docket
or similar method for receiving and
considering comments and shall make
comments available for inspection to
interested parties specified in para-
graph (b) of this section upon request.
Comments must be retained for two
years.
(b) Each aircraft operator shall
promptly notify interested parties if it
makes a substantial change in its anal-
ysis that affects either the costs or
benefits analyzed, or the criteria in
§ 161.305, differently from the analysis
made available for comment in accord-
ance with § 161.407. Interested parties
include those who received direct no-
tice under paragraph (a) of § 161.407 and
those who have commented on the re-
evaluation. If an aircraft operator re-
vises its analysis, it shall make the re-
vised analysis available to an inter-
ested party upon request and shall ex-
tend the comment period at least 45
days from the date the revised analysis
is made available.
§ 161.413 Reevaluation procedure.
(a) Each aircraft operator requesting
a reevaluation shall submit to the
FAA:
(1) The analysis described in § 161.409;
(2) Evidence that the public review
process was carried out in accordance
with §§ 161.407 and 161.411, including the
aircraft operator’s summary of the
comments received; and
(3) A request that the FAA complete
a reevaluation of the restriction and
issue findings.
(b) Following confirmation by the
FAA that the aircraft operator’s docu-
mentation is complete according to the
requirements of this subpart, the FAA
will publish a notice of reevaluation in
the F
EDERAL
R
EGISTER
and provide for
a 45-day comment period during which
interested parties may submit com-
ments to the FAA. The FAA will spe-
cifically solicit comments from the af-
fected airport operator and affected
local governments. A submission that
is not complete will be returned to the
aircraft operator with a letter indi-
cating the deficiency, and no notice
will be published. No further action
will be taken by the FAA until a com-
plete submission is received.
(c) The FAA will review all sub-
mitted documentation and comments
pursuant to the conditions of § 161.305.
To the extent necessary, the FAA may
request additional information from
808
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition)
§ 161.415
the aircraft operator, airport operator,
and others known to have information
material to the reevaluation, and may
convene an informal meeting to gather
facts relevant to a reevaluation find-
ing.
§ 161.415 Reevaluation action.
(a) Upon completing the reevalua-
tion, the FAA will issue appropriate or-
ders regarding whether or not there is
substantial evidence that the restric-
tion meets the criteria in § 161.305 of
this part.
(b) If the FAA’s reevaluation con-
firms that the restriction meets the
criteria, the restriction may remain as
previously agreed to or approved. If the
FAA’s reevaluation concludes that the
restriction does not meet the criteria,
the FAA will withdraw a previous ap-
proval of the restriction issued under
subpart D of this part to the extent
necessary to bring the restriction into
compliance with this part or, with re-
spect to a restriction agreed to under
subpart B of this part, the FAA will
specify which criteria are not met.
(c) The FAA will publish a notice of
its reevaluation findings in the F
ED
-
ERAL
R
EGISTER
and notify in writing
the aircraft operator that petitioned
the FAA for reevaluation and the af-
fected airport operator.
§ 161.417 Notification of status of re-
strictions and agreements not meet-
ing conditions-of-approval criteria.
If the FAA has withdrawn all or part
of a previous approval made under sub-
part D of this part, the relevant por-
tion of the Stage 3 restriction must be
rescinded. The operator of the affected
airport shall notify the FAA of the op-
erator’s action with regard to a restric-
tion affecting Stage 3 aircraft oper-
ations that has been found not to meet
the criteria of § 161.305. Restrictions in
agreements determined by the FAA not
to meet conditions for approval may
not be enforced with respect to Stage 3
aircraft operations.
Subpart F—Failure To Comply With
This Part
§ 161.501 Scope.
(a) This subpart describes the proce-
dures to terminate eligibility for air-
port grant funds and authority to im-
pose or collect passenger facility
charges for an airport operator’s fail-
ure to comply with the Airport Noise
and Capacity Act of 1990 (49 U.S.C. App.
2151
et seq.
) or this part. These proce-
dures may be used with or in addition
to any judicial proceedings initiated by
the FAA to protect the national avia-
tion system and related Federal inter-
ests.
(b) Under no conditions shall any air-
port operator receive revenues under
the provisions of the Airport and Air-
way Improvement Act of 1982 or impose
or collect a passenger facility charge
under section 1113(e) of the Federal
Aviation Act of 1958 if the FAA deter-
mines that the airport is imposing any
noise or access restriction not in com-
pliance with the Airport Noise and Ca-
pacity Act of 1990 or this part. Recision
of, or a commitment in writing signed
by an authorized official of the airport
operator to rescind or permanently not
enforce, a noncomplying restriction
will be treated by the FAA as action
restoring compliance with the Airport
Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 or this
part with respect to that restriction.
§ 161.503 Informal resolution; notice of
apparent violation.
Prior to the initiation of formal ac-
tion to terminate eligibility for airport
grant funds or authority to impose or
collect passenger facility charges
under this subpart, the FAA shall un-
dertake informal resolution with the
airport operator to assure compliance
with the Airport Noise and Capacity
Act of 1990 or this part upon receipt of
a complaint or other evidence that an
airport operator has taken action to
impose a noise or access restriction
that appears to be in violation. This
shall not preclude a FAA application
for expedited judicial action for other
than termination of airport grants and
passenger facility charges to protect
the national aviation system and vio-
lated federal interests. If informal res-
olution is not successful, the FAA will
notify the airport operator in writing
of the apparent violation. The airport
operator shall respond to the notice in
writing not later than 20 days after re-
ceipt of the notice, and also state
whether the airport operator will agree