background image

120 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 17.21 

not constitute a final agency order, un-
less and until such dismissal or deci-
sion is incorporated or otherwise 
adopted in a decision by the Adminis-
trator (or the ODRA, by delegation) re-
garding the entire protest. 

(e) Prior to recommending or enter-

ing either a dismissal or a summary de-
cision, either in whole or in part, the 
ODRA shall afford all parties against 
whom the dismissal or summary deci-
sion is to be entered the opportunity to 
respond to the proposed dismissal or 
summary decision. 

§ 17.21

Adjudicative Process for pro-

tests. 

(a) Other than for the resolution of 

preliminary or dispositive matters, the 
Adjudicative Process for protests will 
be commenced by the ODRA Director 
pursuant to § 17.17(e). 

(b) The Director of the ODRA shall 

appoint a DRO or a Special Master to 
conduct the adjudication proceedings, 
develop the administrative record, and 
prepare findings and recommendations 
for review of the ODRA Director. 

(c) The DRO or Special Master may 

conduct such proceedings and prepare 
procedural orders for the proceedings 
as deemed appropriate; and may re-
quire additional submissions from the 
parties. 

(d) The Product Team response to the 

protest will be due to be filed and 
served ten (10) business days from the 
commencement of the ODRA Adjudica-
tion process. The Product Team re-
sponse shall consist of a written chron-
ological, supported statement of pro-
posed facts, and a written presentation 
of applicable legal or other defenses. 
The Product Team response shall cite 
to and be accompanied by all relevant 
documents, which shall be chrono-
logically indexed, individually tabbed, 
and certified as authentic and com-
plete. A copy of the response shall be 
furnished so as to be received by the 
protester and any intervenor(s) on the 
same date it is filed with the ODRA. In 
all cases, the Product Team shall indi-
cate the method of service used. 

(e) Comments of the protester and 

the intervenor on the Product Team re-
sponse will be due to be filed and 
served five (5) business days after their 
receipt of the response. Copies of such 

comments shall be provided to the 
other participating parties by the same 
means and on the same date as they 
are furnished to the ODRA. Comments 
may include any supplemental relevant 
documents. 

(f) The ODRA may alter the schedule 

for filing of the Product Team response 
and the comments for good cause or to 
accommodate the circumstances of a 
particular protest. 

(g) The DRO or Special Master may 

convene the parties and/or their rep-
resentatives, as needed for the Adju-
dicative Process. 

(h) If, in the sole judgment of the 

DRO or Special Master, the parties 
have presented written material suffi-
cient to allow the protest to be decided 
on the record presented, the DRO or 
Special Master shall have the discre-
tion to decide the protest on that basis. 

(i) The parties may engage in lim-

ited, focused discovery with one an-
other and, if justified, with non-par-
ties, so as to obtain information rel-
evant to the allegations of the protest. 

(1) The DRO or Special Master shall 

manage the discovery process, includ-
ing limiting its length and availability, 
and shall establish schedules and dead-
lines for discovery, which are con-
sistent with timeframes established in 
this part and with the FAA policy of 
providing fair and expeditious dispute 
resolution. 

(2) The DRO or Special Master may 

also direct the parties to exchange, in 
an expedited manner, relevant, non- 
privileged documents. 

(3) Where justified, the DRO or Spe-

cial Master may direct the taking of 
deposition testimony, however, the 
FAA dispute resolution process does 
not contemplate extensive discovery. 

(4) The use of interrogatories and re-

quests for admission is not permitted 
in ODRA bid protests. 

(5) Where parties cannot voluntarily 

reach agreement on a discovery-related 
issue, they may timely seek assistance 
from an ODRA ADR neutral or may file 
an appropriate motion with the ODRA. 
Parties may request a subpoena. 

(6) Discovery requests and responses 

are not part of the record and will not 
be filed with the ODRA, except in con-
nection with a motion or other permis-
sible filing. 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00130

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

121 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 17.23 

(7) Unless timely objection is made, 

documents properly filed with the 
ODRA will be deemed admitted into 
the administrative record. 

(j) Hearings are not typically held in 

bid protests. The DRO or Special Mas-
ter may conduct hearings, and may 
limit the hearings to the testimony of 
specific witnesses and/or presentations 
regarding specific issues. The DRO or 
Special Master shall control the nature 
and conduct of all hearings, including 
the sequence and extent of any testi-
mony. Hearings will be conducted: 

(1) Where the DRO or Special Master 

determines that there are complex fac-
tual issues in dispute that cannot ade-
quately or efficiently be developed 
solely by means of written presen-
tations and/or that resolution of the 
controversy will be dependent on his/ 
her assessment of the credibility of 
statements provided by individuals 
with first-hand knowledge of the facts; 
or 

(2) Upon request of any party to the 

protest, unless the DRO or Special 
Master finds specifically that a hearing 
is unnecessary and that no party will 
be prejudiced by limiting the record in 
the adjudication to the parties’ written 
submissions. All witnesses at any such 
hearing shall be subject to cross-exam-
ination by the opposing party and to 
questioning by the DRO or Special 
Master. 

(k) The Director of the ODRA may 

review the status of any protest in the 
Adjudicative Process with the DRO or 
Special Master. 

(l) After the closing of the adminis-

trative record, the DRO or Special 
Master will prepare and submit find-
ings and recommendations to the 
ODRA that shall contain the following: 

(1) Findings of fact; 
(2) Application of the principles of 

the AMS, and any applicable law or au-
thority to the findings of fact; 

(3) A recommendation for a final 

FAA order; and 

(4) If appropriate, suggestions for fu-

ture FAA action. 

(m) In preparing findings and rec-

ommendations in protests, the DRO or 
Special Master, using the preponder-
ance of the evidence standard, shall 
consider whether the Product Team ac-
tions in question were consistent with 

the requirements of the AMS, had a ra-
tional basis, and whether the Product 
Team decision was arbitrary, capri-
cious or an abuse of discretion. Not-
withstanding the above, allegations 
that government officials acted with 
bias or in bad faith must be established 
by clear and convincing evidence. 

(n) The DRO or Special Master has 

broad discretion to recommend a rem-
edy that is consistent with § 17.23. 

(o) A DRO or Special Master shall 

submit findings and recommendations 
only to the Director of the ODRA or 
the Director’s designee. The findings 
and recommendations will be released 
to the parties and to the public upon 
issuance of the final FAA order in the 
case. If an ODRA protective order was 
issued in connection with the protest, 
or if a protest involves proprietary or 
competition-sensitive information, a 
redacted version of the findings and 
recommendations, omitting any pro-
tected information, shall be prepared 
wherever possible and released to the 
public, as soon as is practicable, along 
with a copy of the final FAA order. 
Only persons admitted by the ODRA 
under the protective order and Govern-
ment personnel shall be provided cop-
ies of the unredacted findings and rec-
ommendations that contain propri-
etary or competition-sensitive infor-
mation. 

(p) Other than communications re-

garding purely procedural matters or 
ADR, there shall be no substantive 

ex 

parte  communication between ODRA 
personnel and any principal or rep-
resentative of a party concerning a 
pending or potentially pending matter. 
A potential or serving ADR neutral 
may communicate on an 

ex parte basis 

to establish or conduct the ADR. 

§ 17.23

Protest remedies. 

(a) The ODRA has broad discretion to 

recommend and impose protest rem-
edies that are consistent with the AMS 
and applicable law. Such remedies may 
include, but are not limited to one or a 
combination of, the following: 

(1) Amend the SIR; 
(2) Refrain from exercising options 

under the contract; 

(3) Issue a new SIR; 
(4) Require a recompetition or reval-

uation; 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00131

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR