background image

886 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 171.317 

(c) The period during which erro-

neous guidance information is radiated 
must not exceed the periods specified 
in § 171.315(a). If the fault is not cleared 
within the time allowed, the ground 
equipment must be shut down. After 
shutdown, no attempt must be made to 
restore service until a period of 20 sec-
onds has elapsed. 

§ 171.317 Approach elevation perform-

ance requirements. 

This section prescribes the perform-

ance requirements for the elevation 
equipment components of the MLS as 
follows: 

(a) 

Elevation coverage requirements. 

The approach elevation facility must 
provide proportional guidance informa-
tion in at least the following volume of 
space (see Figure 13): 

(1) Laterally within a sector origi-

nating at the datum point which is at 
least equal to the proportional guid-
ance sector provided by the approach 
azimuth ground equipment. 

(2) Longitudinally from 75 meters (250 

feet) from the datum point to 20 nau-
tical miles from threshold in the direc-
tion of the approach. 

(3) Vertically within the sector 

bounded by: 

(i) A surface which is the locus of 

points 2.5 meters (8 feet) above the run-
way surface; 

(ii) A conical surface originating at 

the datum point and inclined 0.9 degree 
above the horizontal and, 

(iii) A conical surface originating at 

the datum point and inclined at 15.0 de-
grees above the horizontal up to a 
height of 6000 meters (20,000 feet). 

background image

887 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 171.317 

Where the physical characteristics of 
the approach region prevent 
theachievement of the standards under 
paragraphs (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this 

section, guidance need not be provided 
below a conical surface originating at 
the elevation antenna and inclined 0.9 
degree above the line of sight. 

background image

888 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 171.317 

(4) Within the elevation coverage sec-

tor defined in paragraphs (a) (1), (2) and 
(3) of this section, the power densities 
must not be less than those shown in 
Table 9, but the equipment design must 
also allow for: 

(i) Transmitter power degradation 

from normal by 

¥

1.5 dB. 

(ii) Rain loss of 

¥

2.2 dB at the cov-

erage extremes. 

(b) 

Elevation siting requirements. 

The 

Elevation Antenna System must: 

(1) Be located as close to runway cen-

terline as possible (without violating 
obstacle clearance criteria). 

(2) Be located near runway threshold 

such that the asymptote of the min-
imum glidepath crosses the threshold 
of the runway at the Approach Ref-
erence Datum height. Normally, the 
minimum glidepath should be 3 degrees 
and the Approach Reference Datum 
height should be 50 feet. However, 
there are circumstances where other 
glideslopes and reference datum 
heights are appropriate. Some of these 
instances are discussed in FAA Order 
8260.34 (Glide Slope Threshold Crossing 
Height Requirements) and Order 8260.3 
(IFR Approval of MLS.) 

(3) Be located such that the MLS Ap-

proach Reference Datum and ILS Ref-
erence Datum heights are coincident 
within a tolerance of 3 feet when MLS 
is installed on a runway already served 
by an ILS. This requirement applies 
only if the ILS glide slope is sited such 
that the height of the reference datum 
meets the requirements of FAA Order 
8260.34. 

(c) 

Antenna coordinates. 

The scanning 

beams transmitted by the elevation 
subsystem must be conical. 

(d) 

Elevation accuracy. 

(1) The accura-

cies shown in Table 13 are required at 
the approach reference datum. From 
the approach reference datum to the 
coverage limit, the PFE, PFN and CMN 
limits shall be allowed to linearly in-
crease as follows: 

(i) With distance along the runway 

centerline extended at the minimum 
glide path angle, by a factor of 1.2 for 
the PFE and PFN limits and to 

±

0.10 

degree for the CMN limits; 

(ii) With azimuth angle, from runway 

centerline extended to the coverage ex-
treme, by a factor of 1.2 for the PFE 

and PFN limits and by a factor of 2.0 
for the CMN limits; 

(iii) With increasing elevation angles 

from + 3 degrees to + 15 degrees, by a 
factor of 2.0 for the PFE and PFN lim-
its; 

T

ABLE

13—E

LEVATION

A

CCURACIES AT THE

 

A

PPROACH

R

EFERENCE

D

ATUM

 

Error type 

System 

Angular error (degrees) 

Ground sub-

system 

Airborne 

subsystem

4

 

PFE ....................

12

±

0.133 

(

3

±

0.017 

CMN ..................

1

±

0.050 

±

0.020 

±

0.010 

Notes: 

1

Includes errors due to ground and airborne equipment and 

propagation effects. 

2

The system PFN component must not exceed 

±

0.087 de-

gree. 

3

The mean (bias) error component contributed by the 

ground equipment should not exceed 

±

0.067 degree. 

4

The airborne subsystem angular errors are provided for in-

formation only. 

(iv) With decreasing elevation angle 

from + 3 degrees (or 60% of the min-
imum glide path angle, whichever is 
less) to the coverage extreme, by a fac-
tor of 3 for the PFE, PFN and CMN 
limits; and 

(v) Maximum angular limits. the 

CMN limits shall not exceed 

±

0.10 de-

gree in any coverage region within 

±

10 

degrees laterally of runway centerline 
extended which is above the elevation 
angle specified in (iv) above. 

N

OTE

: It is desirable that the CMN not ex-

ceed 

±

0.10 degree throughout the coverage re-

gion above the elevation angle specified in 
paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this section. 

(2) The system and ground subsystem 

accuracies shown in Table 13 are to be 
demonstrated at commissioning as 
maximum error limits. Subsequent to 
commissioning, the accuracies are to 
be considered at 95% probability limits. 

(e) Elevation antenna characteristics 

are as follows: 

(1) 

Drift. 

Any elevation angle as en-

coded by the scanning beam at any 
point within the coverage sector must 
not vary more than 0.04 degree over the 
range of service conditions specified in 
§ 171.309(d) without the use of internal 
environmental controls. Multipath ef-
fects are excluded from this require-
ment. 

(2) 

Beam pointing errors. 

The elevation 

angle as encoded by the scanning beam 
at any point within the coverage sector 

background image

889 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 171.319 

must not deviate from the true ele-
vation angle at that point by more 
than 

±

0.04 degree for elevation angles 

from 2.5

° 

to 3.5

°

. Above 3.5

° 

these errors 

may linearly increase to 

±

0.1 degree at 

7.5

°

. Multipath and drift effects are ex-

cluded from this requirement. 

(3) 

Antenna alignment. 

The antenna 

must be equipped with suitable optical, 
electrical, or mechanical means or any 
combination of the three, to align the 
lowest operationally required glidepath 
to the true glidepath angle with a max-
imum error of 0.01 degree. Addition-
ally, the elevation antenna bias adjust-
ment must be electronically steerable 
at least to the monitor limits in steps 
not greater than 0.005 degrees. 

(4) 

Antenna far field patterns in the 

plane of scan. 

On the lowest operation-

ally required glidepath, the antenna 
mainlobe pattern must conform to Fig-
ure 10, and the beamwidth must be 
such that in the installed environment, 
no significant ground reflections of the 
mainlobe exist. In any case, the beam-
width must not exceed 2 degrees. The 
antenna mainlobe may be allowed to 
broaden from the value at boresight by 
a factor of 1/cos

q

, where 

is the angle 

of boresight. Anywhere within cov-
erage, the 

¥

3 dB width of the antenna 

mainlobe, while scanning normally, 
must not be less than 25 microseconds 
(0.5 degrees) or greater than 250 micro-
seconds (5 degrees). The sidelobe levels 
must be as follows: 

(i) 

Dynamic sidelobe levels. 

With the 

antenna scanning normally, the dy-
namic sidelobe level that is detected by 
a receiver at any point within the pro-
portional coverage sector must be 
down at least 10 dB from the peak of 
the mainlobe. Outside the proportional 
coverage sector, the radiation from the 
scanning beam antenna must be of 
such a nature that receiver warnings 
will not be removed or a suitable OCI 
signal must be provided. 

(ii) 

Effective sidelobe levels. 

With the 

antenna scanning normally, the 
sidelobe levels in the plane of scan 
must be such that, when reflected from 
the ground, the resultant PFE along 
any glidepath does not exceed 0.083 de-
grees. 

(5) 

Antenna far field pattern in the hor-

izontal plane. 

The horizontal pattern of 

the antenna must gradually de-empha-

size the signal away from antenna 
boresight. Typically, the horizontal 
pattern should be reduced by at least 3 
dB at 20 degrees off boresight and by at 
least 6 dB at 40 degrees off boresight. 
Depending on the actual multipath 
conditions, the horizontal radiation 
patterns may require more or less de- 
emphasis. 

(6) 

Data antenna. 

The data antenna 

must have horizontal and vertical pat-
terns as required for its function. 

(f) 

False guidance. 

False courses 

which can be acquired and tracked by 
an aircraft shall not exist anywhere ei-
ther inside or outside of the MLS cov-
erage sector. False courses which exist 
outside of the minimum coverage sec-
tor may be suppressed by the use of 
OCI. 

N

OTE

: False courses may be due to (but not 

limited to) MLS airborne receiver acquisi-
tion of the following types of false guidance: 
reflections of the scanning beam and scan-
ning beam antenna sidelobes and grating 
lobes. 

§ 171.319 Approach elevation monitor 

system requirements. 

(a) The monitor system must act to 

ensure that any of the following condi-
tions do not persist for longer than the 
periods specified when: 

(1) There is a change in the ground 

component contribution to the mean 
glidepath error component such that 
the path following error on any glide-
path exceeds the limits specified in 
§ 171.317(d) for a period of more than 
one second. 

N

OTE

: The above requirement and the re-

quirement to limit the ground equipment 
mean error to 

±

0.067 degree can be satisfied 

by the following procedure. The integral 
monitor alarm limit should be set to 

±

0.067 

degree. This will limit the electrical compo-
nent of mean glidepath error to 

±

0.067 degree. 

The field monitor alarm limit should be set 
such that with the mean glidepath error at 
the alarm limit the total allowed PFE is not 
exceeded on any commissioned glidepath 
from the limit of coverage to an altitude of 
100 feet. 

(2) There is a reduction in the radi-

ated power to a level not less than that 
specified in § 171.317(a)(4) for a period of 
more than one second. 

(3) There is an error in the preamble 

DPSK transmission which occurs more 
than once in any one second period.