515
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 27.672
(1) There must be means for venting
the internal pressure of the blade;
(2) Drainage holes must be provided
for the blade; and
(3) The blade must be designed to pre-
vent water from becoming trapped in
it.
(b) Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section does not apply to sealed rotor
blades capable of withstanding the
maximum pressure differentials ex-
pected in service.
[Amdt. 27–2, 33 FR 963, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 27.659
Mass balance.
(a) The rotors and blades must be
mass balanced as necessary to—
(1) Prevent excessive vibration; and
(2) Prevent flutter at any speed up to
the maximum forward speed.
(b) The structural integrity of the
mass balance installation must be sub-
stantiated.
[Amdt. 27–2, 33 FR 963, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 27.661
Rotor blade clearance.
There must be enough clearance be-
tween the rotor blades and other parts
of the structure to prevent the blades
from striking any part of the structure
during any operating condition.
[Amdt. 27–2, 33 FR 963, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 27.663
Ground resonance prevention
means.
(a) The reliability of the means for
preventing ground resonance must be
shown either by analysis and tests, or
reliable service experience, or by show-
ing through analysis or tests that mal-
function or failure of a single means
will not cause ground resonance.
(b) The probable range of variations,
during service, of the damping action
of the ground resonance prevention
means must be established and must be
investigated during the test required
by § 27.241.
[Amdt. 27–2, 33 FR 963, Jan. 26, 1968, as
amended by Amdt. 27–26, 55 FR 8000, Mar. 6,
1990]
C
ONTROL
S
YSTEMS
§ 27.671
General.
(a) Each control and control system
must operate with the ease, smooth-
ness, and positiveness appropriate to
its function.
(b) Each element of each flight con-
trol system must be designed, or dis-
tinctively and permanently marked, to
minimize the probability of any incor-
rect assembly that could result in the
malfunction of the system.
§ 27.672
Stability augmentation, auto-
matic, and power-operated systems.
If the functioning of stability aug-
mentation or other automatic or
power-operated systems is necessary to
show compliance with the flight char-
acteristics requirements of this part,
such systems must comply with § 27.671
of this part and the following:
(a) A warning which is clearly distin-
guishable to the pilot under expected
flight conditions without requiring the
pilot’s attention must be provided for
any failure in the stability augmenta-
tion system or in any other automatic
or power-operated system which could
result in an unsafe condition if the
pilot is unaware of the failure. Warning
systems must not activate the control
systems.
(b) The design of the stability aug-
mentation system or of any other auto-
matic or power-operated system must
allow initial counteraction of failures
without requiring exceptional pilot
skill or strength by overriding the fail-
ure by movement of the flight controls
in the normal sense and deactivating
the failed system.
(c) It must be shown that after any
single failure of the stability aug-
mentation system or any other auto-
matic or power-operated system—
(1) The rotorcraft is safely control-
lable when the failure or malfunction
occurs at any speed or altitude within
the approved operating limitations;
(2) The controllability and maneuver-
ability requirements of this part are
met within a practical operational
flight envelope (for example, speed, al-
titude, normal acceleration, and rotor-
craft configurations) which is described
in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual; and
(3) The trim and stability character-
istics are not impaired below a level
needed to permit continued safe flight
and landing.
[Amdt. 27–21, 49 FR 44433, Nov. 6, 1984; 49 FR
47594, Dec. 6, 1984]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
09:06 Jun 28, 2024
Jkt 262046
PO 00000
Frm 00525
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8010
Y:\SGML\262046.XXX
262046
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR