background image

604 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 29.623 

(2) Need not be used with respect to 

the bearing surfaces of a part whose 
bearing factor is larger than the appli-
cable casting factor. 

(c) 

Critical castings. For each casting 

whose failure would preclude continued 
safe flight and landing of the rotorcraft 
or result in serious injury to any occu-
pant, the following apply: 

(1) Each critical casting must— 
(i) Have a casting factor of not less 

than 1.25; and 

(ii) Receive 100 percent inspection by 

visual, radiographic, and magnetic par-
ticle (for ferromagnetic materials) or 
penetrant (for nonferromagnetic mate-
rials) inspection methods or approved 
equivalent inspection methods. 

(2) For each critical casting with a 

casting factor less than 1.50, three sam-
ple castings must be static tested and 
shown to meet— 

(i) The strength requirements of 

§ 29.305 at an ultimate load cor-
responding to a casting factor of 1.25; 
and 

(ii) The deformation requirements of 

§ 29.305 at a load of 1.15 times the limit 
load. 

(d) 

Noncritical castings. For each cast-

ing other than those specified in para-
graph (c) of this section, the following 
apply: 

(1) Except as provided in paragraphs 

(d)(2) and (3) of this section, the casting 
factors and corresponding inspections 
must meet the following table: 

Casting factor 

Inspection 

2.0 or greater ...............

100 percent visual. 

Less than 2.0, greater 

than 1.5.

100 percent visual, and magnetic 

particle (ferromagnetic materials), 
penetrant (nonferromagnetic ma-
terials), or approved equivalent 
inspection methods. 

1.25 through 1.50 ........

100 percent visual, and magnetic 

particle (ferromagnetic materials), 
penetrant (nonferromagnetic ma-
terials), and radiographic or ap-
proved equivalent inspection 
methods. 

(2) The percentage of castings in-

spected by nonvisual methods may be 
reduced below that specified in para-
graph (d)(1) of this section when an ap-
proved quality control procedure is es-
tablished. 

(3) For castings procured to a speci-

fication that guarantees the mechan-
ical properties of the material in the 
casting and provides for demonstration 

of these properties by test of coupons 
cut from the castings on a sampling 
basis— 

(i) A casting factor of 1.0 may be 

used; and 

(ii) The castings must be inspected as 

provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this sec-
tion for casting factors of ‘‘1.25 through 
1.50’’ and tested under paragraph (c)(2) 
of this section. 

[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as 
amended by Amdt. 29–41, 62 FR 46173, Aug. 29, 
1997] 

§ 29.623

Bearing factors. 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph 

(b) of this section, each part that has 
clearance (free fit), and that is subject 
to pounding or vibration, must have a 
bearing factor large enough to provide 
for the effects of normal relative mo-
tion. 

(b) No bearing factor need be used on 

a part for which any larger special fac-
tor is prescribed. 

§ 29.625

Fitting factors. 

For each fitting (part or terminal 

used to join one structural member to 
another) the following apply: 

(a) For each fitting whose strength is 

not proven by limit and ultimate load 
tests in which actual stress conditions 
are simulated in the fitting and sur-
rounding structures, a fitting factor of 
at least 1.15 must be applied to each 
part of— 

(1) The fitting; 
(2) The means of attachment; and 
(3) The bearing on the joined mem-

bers. 

(b) No fitting factor need be used— 
(1) For joints made under approved 

practices and based on comprehensive 
test data (such as continuous joints in 
metal plating, welded joints, and scarf 
joints in wood); and 

(2) With respect to any bearing sur-

face for which a larger special factor is 
used. 

(c) For each integral fitting, the part 

must be treated as a fitting up to the 
point at which the section properties 
become typical of the member. 

(d) Each seat, berth, litter, safety 

belt, and harness attachment to the 
structure must be shown by analysis, 
tests, or both, to be able to withstand 
the inertia forces prescribed in 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00614

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

605 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 29.672 

§ 29.561(b)(3) multiplied by a fitting fac-
tor of 1.33. 

[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as 
amended by Amdt. 29–42, 63 FR 43285, Aug. 12, 
1998] 

§ 29.629

Flutter and divergence. 

Each aerodynamic surface of the 

rotorcraft must be free from flutter 
and divergence under each appropriate 
speed and power condition. 

[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996] 

§ 29.631

Bird strike. 

The rotorcraft must be designed to 

ensure capability of continued safe 
flight and landing (for Category A) or 
safe landing (for Category B) after im-
pact with a 2.2-lb (1.0 kg) bird when the 
velocity of the rotorcraft (relative to 
the bird along the flight path of the 
rotorcraft) is equal to V

NE

or V

H

 

(whichever is the lesser) at altitudes up 
to 8,000 feet. Compliance must be 
shown by tests or by analysis based on 
tests carried out on sufficiently rep-
resentative structures of similar de-
sign. 

[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996; 61 
FR 33963, July 1, 1996] 

R

OTORS

 

§ 29.653

Pressure venting and drain-

age of rotor blades. 

(a) For each rotor blade— 
(1) There must be means for venting 

the internal pressure of the blade; 

(2) Drainage holes must be provided 

for the blade; and 

(3) The blade must be designed to pre-

vent water from becoming trapped in 
it. 

(b) Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this 

section does not apply to sealed rotor 
blades capable of withstanding the 
maximum pressure differentials ex-
pected in service. 

[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968] 

§ 29.659

Mass balance. 

(a) The rotor and blades must be 

mass balanced as necessary to— 

(1) Prevent excessive vibration; and 
(2) Prevent flutter at any speed up to 

the maximum forward speed. 

(b) The structural integrity of the 

mass balance installation must be sub-
stantiated. 

[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968] 

§ 29.661

Rotor blade clearance. 

There must be enough clearance be-

tween the rotor blades and other parts 
of the structure to prevent the blades 
from striking any part of the structure 
during any operating condition. 

[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968] 

§ 29.663

Ground resonance prevention 

means. 

(a) The reliability of the means for 

preventing ground resonance must be 
shown either by analysis and tests, or 
reliable service experience, or by show-
ing through analysis or tests that mal-
function or failure of a single means 
will not cause ground resonance. 

(b) The probable range of variations, 

during service, of the damping action 
of the ground resonance prevention 
means must be established and must be 
investigated during the test required 
by § 29.241. 

[Amdt. 27–26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990] 

C

ONTROL

S

YSTEMS

 

§ 29.671

General. 

(a) Each control and control system 

must operate with the ease, smooth-
ness, and positiveness appropriate to 
its function. 

(b) Each element of each flight con-

trol system must be designed, or dis-
tinctively and permanently marked, to 
minimize the probability of any incor-
rect assembly that could result in the 
malfunction of the system. 

(c) A means must be provided to 

allow full control movement of all pri-
mary flight controls prior to flight, or 
a means must be provided that will 
allow the pilot to determine that full 
control authority is available prior to 
flight. 

[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as 
amended by Amdt. 29–24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6, 
1984] 

§ 29.672

Stability augmentation, auto-

matic, and power-operated systems. 

If the functioning of stability aug-

mentation or other automatic or 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00615

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR