604
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition)
§ 29.623
(2) Need not be used with respect to
the bearing surfaces of a part whose
bearing factor is larger than the appli-
cable casting factor.
(c)
Critical castings. For each casting
whose failure would preclude continued
safe flight and landing of the rotorcraft
or result in serious injury to any occu-
pant, the following apply:
(1) Each critical casting must—
(i) Have a casting factor of not less
than 1.25; and
(ii) Receive 100 percent inspection by
visual, radiographic, and magnetic par-
ticle (for ferromagnetic materials) or
penetrant (for nonferromagnetic mate-
rials) inspection methods or approved
equivalent inspection methods.
(2) For each critical casting with a
casting factor less than 1.50, three sam-
ple castings must be static tested and
shown to meet—
(i) The strength requirements of
§ 29.305 at an ultimate load cor-
responding to a casting factor of 1.25;
and
(ii) The deformation requirements of
§ 29.305 at a load of 1.15 times the limit
load.
(d)
Noncritical castings. For each cast-
ing other than those specified in para-
graph (c) of this section, the following
apply:
(1) Except as provided in paragraphs
(d)(2) and (3) of this section, the casting
factors and corresponding inspections
must meet the following table:
Casting factor
Inspection
2.0 or greater ...............
100 percent visual.
Less than 2.0, greater
than 1.5.
100 percent visual, and magnetic
particle (ferromagnetic materials),
penetrant (nonferromagnetic ma-
terials), or approved equivalent
inspection methods.
1.25 through 1.50 ........
100 percent visual, and magnetic
particle (ferromagnetic materials),
penetrant (nonferromagnetic ma-
terials), and radiographic or ap-
proved equivalent inspection
methods.
(2) The percentage of castings in-
spected by nonvisual methods may be
reduced below that specified in para-
graph (d)(1) of this section when an ap-
proved quality control procedure is es-
tablished.
(3) For castings procured to a speci-
fication that guarantees the mechan-
ical properties of the material in the
casting and provides for demonstration
of these properties by test of coupons
cut from the castings on a sampling
basis—
(i) A casting factor of 1.0 may be
used; and
(ii) The castings must be inspected as
provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this sec-
tion for casting factors of ‘‘1.25 through
1.50’’ and tested under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–41, 62 FR 46173, Aug. 29,
1997]
§ 29.623
Bearing factors.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, each part that has
clearance (free fit), and that is subject
to pounding or vibration, must have a
bearing factor large enough to provide
for the effects of normal relative mo-
tion.
(b) No bearing factor need be used on
a part for which any larger special fac-
tor is prescribed.
§ 29.625
Fitting factors.
For each fitting (part or terminal
used to join one structural member to
another) the following apply:
(a) For each fitting whose strength is
not proven by limit and ultimate load
tests in which actual stress conditions
are simulated in the fitting and sur-
rounding structures, a fitting factor of
at least 1.15 must be applied to each
part of—
(1) The fitting;
(2) The means of attachment; and
(3) The bearing on the joined mem-
bers.
(b) No fitting factor need be used—
(1) For joints made under approved
practices and based on comprehensive
test data (such as continuous joints in
metal plating, welded joints, and scarf
joints in wood); and
(2) With respect to any bearing sur-
face for which a larger special factor is
used.
(c) For each integral fitting, the part
must be treated as a fitting up to the
point at which the section properties
become typical of the member.
(d) Each seat, berth, litter, safety
belt, and harness attachment to the
structure must be shown by analysis,
tests, or both, to be able to withstand
the inertia forces prescribed in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
09:06 Jun 28, 2024
Jkt 262046
PO 00000
Frm 00614
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8010
Y:\SGML\262046.XXX
262046
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR
605
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 29.672
§ 29.561(b)(3) multiplied by a fitting fac-
tor of 1.33.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–42, 63 FR 43285, Aug. 12,
1998]
§ 29.629
Flutter and divergence.
Each aerodynamic surface of the
rotorcraft must be free from flutter
and divergence under each appropriate
speed and power condition.
[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996]
§ 29.631
Bird strike.
The rotorcraft must be designed to
ensure capability of continued safe
flight and landing (for Category A) or
safe landing (for Category B) after im-
pact with a 2.2-lb (1.0 kg) bird when the
velocity of the rotorcraft (relative to
the bird along the flight path of the
rotorcraft) is equal to V
NE
or V
H
(whichever is the lesser) at altitudes up
to 8,000 feet. Compliance must be
shown by tests or by analysis based on
tests carried out on sufficiently rep-
resentative structures of similar de-
sign.
[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996; 61
FR 33963, July 1, 1996]
R
OTORS
§ 29.653
Pressure venting and drain-
age of rotor blades.
(a) For each rotor blade—
(1) There must be means for venting
the internal pressure of the blade;
(2) Drainage holes must be provided
for the blade; and
(3) The blade must be designed to pre-
vent water from becoming trapped in
it.
(b) Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section does not apply to sealed rotor
blades capable of withstanding the
maximum pressure differentials ex-
pected in service.
[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 29.659
Mass balance.
(a) The rotor and blades must be
mass balanced as necessary to—
(1) Prevent excessive vibration; and
(2) Prevent flutter at any speed up to
the maximum forward speed.
(b) The structural integrity of the
mass balance installation must be sub-
stantiated.
[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 29.661
Rotor blade clearance.
There must be enough clearance be-
tween the rotor blades and other parts
of the structure to prevent the blades
from striking any part of the structure
during any operating condition.
[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 29.663
Ground resonance prevention
means.
(a) The reliability of the means for
preventing ground resonance must be
shown either by analysis and tests, or
reliable service experience, or by show-
ing through analysis or tests that mal-
function or failure of a single means
will not cause ground resonance.
(b) The probable range of variations,
during service, of the damping action
of the ground resonance prevention
means must be established and must be
investigated during the test required
by § 29.241.
[Amdt. 27–26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990]
C
ONTROL
S
YSTEMS
§ 29.671
General.
(a) Each control and control system
must operate with the ease, smooth-
ness, and positiveness appropriate to
its function.
(b) Each element of each flight con-
trol system must be designed, or dis-
tinctively and permanently marked, to
minimize the probability of any incor-
rect assembly that could result in the
malfunction of the system.
(c) A means must be provided to
allow full control movement of all pri-
mary flight controls prior to flight, or
a means must be provided that will
allow the pilot to determine that full
control authority is available prior to
flight.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6,
1984]
§ 29.672
Stability augmentation, auto-
matic, and power-operated systems.
If the functioning of stability aug-
mentation or other automatic or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
09:06 Jun 28, 2024
Jkt 262046
PO 00000
Frm 00615
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8010
Y:\SGML\262046.XXX
262046
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR