605
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT
§ 29.672
§ 29.561(b)(3) multiplied by a fitting fac-
tor of 1.33.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–42, 63 FR 43285, Aug. 12,
1998]
§ 29.629
Flutter and divergence.
Each aerodynamic surface of the
rotorcraft must be free from flutter
and divergence under each appropriate
speed and power condition.
[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996]
§ 29.631
Bird strike.
The rotorcraft must be designed to
ensure capability of continued safe
flight and landing (for Category A) or
safe landing (for Category B) after im-
pact with a 2.2-lb (1.0 kg) bird when the
velocity of the rotorcraft (relative to
the bird along the flight path of the
rotorcraft) is equal to V
NE
or V
H
(whichever is the lesser) at altitudes up
to 8,000 feet. Compliance must be
shown by tests or by analysis based on
tests carried out on sufficiently rep-
resentative structures of similar de-
sign.
[Doc. No. 28008, 61 FR 21907, May 10, 1996; 61
FR 33963, July 1, 1996]
R
OTORS
§ 29.653
Pressure venting and drain-
age of rotor blades.
(a) For each rotor blade—
(1) There must be means for venting
the internal pressure of the blade;
(2) Drainage holes must be provided
for the blade; and
(3) The blade must be designed to pre-
vent water from becoming trapped in
it.
(b) Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this
section does not apply to sealed rotor
blades capable of withstanding the
maximum pressure differentials ex-
pected in service.
[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 29.659
Mass balance.
(a) The rotor and blades must be
mass balanced as necessary to—
(1) Prevent excessive vibration; and
(2) Prevent flutter at any speed up to
the maximum forward speed.
(b) The structural integrity of the
mass balance installation must be sub-
stantiated.
[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 29.661
Rotor blade clearance.
There must be enough clearance be-
tween the rotor blades and other parts
of the structure to prevent the blades
from striking any part of the structure
during any operating condition.
[Amdt. 29–3, 33 FR 967, Jan. 26, 1968]
§ 29.663
Ground resonance prevention
means.
(a) The reliability of the means for
preventing ground resonance must be
shown either by analysis and tests, or
reliable service experience, or by show-
ing through analysis or tests that mal-
function or failure of a single means
will not cause ground resonance.
(b) The probable range of variations,
during service, of the damping action
of the ground resonance prevention
means must be established and must be
investigated during the test required
by § 29.241.
[Amdt. 27–26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990]
C
ONTROL
S
YSTEMS
§ 29.671
General.
(a) Each control and control system
must operate with the ease, smooth-
ness, and positiveness appropriate to
its function.
(b) Each element of each flight con-
trol system must be designed, or dis-
tinctively and permanently marked, to
minimize the probability of any incor-
rect assembly that could result in the
malfunction of the system.
(c) A means must be provided to
allow full control movement of all pri-
mary flight controls prior to flight, or
a means must be provided that will
allow the pilot to determine that full
control authority is available prior to
flight.
[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as
amended by Amdt. 29–24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6,
1984]
§ 29.672
Stability augmentation, auto-
matic, and power-operated systems.
If the functioning of stability aug-
mentation or other automatic or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
09:06 Jun 28, 2024
Jkt 262046
PO 00000
Frm 00615
Fmt 8010
Sfmt 8010
Y:\SGML\262046.XXX
262046
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR