background image

606 

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–24 Edition) 

§ 29.673 

power-operated system is necessary to 
show compliance with the flight char-
acteristics requirements of this part, 
the system must comply with § 29.671 of 
this part and the following: 

(a) A warning which is clearly distin-

guishable to the pilot under expected 
flight conditions without requiring the 
pilot’s attention must be provided for 
any failure in the stability augmenta-
tion system or in any other automatic 
or power-operated system which could 
result in an unsafe condition if the 
pilot is unaware of the failure. Warning 
systems must not activate the control 
systems. 

(b) The design of the stability aug-

mentation system or of any other auto-
matic or power-operated system must 
allow initial counteraction of failures 
without requiring exceptional pilot 
skill or strength, by overriding the 
failure by moving the flight controls in 
the normal sense, and by deactivating 
the failed system. 

(c) It must be show that after any 

single failure of the stability aug-
mentation system or any other auto-
matic or power-operated system— 

(1) The rotorcraft is safely control-

lable when the failure or malfunction 
occurs at any speed or altitude within 
the approved operating limitations; 

(2) The controllability and maneuver-

ability requirements of this part are 
met within a practical operational 
flight envelope (for example, speed, al-
titude, normal acceleration, and rotor-
craft configurations) which is described 
in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual; and 

(3) The trim and stability character-

istics are not impaired below a level 
needed to allow continued safe flight 
and landing. 

[Amdt. 29–24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6, 1984] 

§ 29.673

Primary flight controls. 

Primary flight controls are those 

used by the pilot for immediate control 
of pitch, roll, yaw, and vertical motion 
of the rotorcraft. 

[Amdt. 29–24, 49 FR 44437, Nov. 6, 1984] 

§ 29.674

Interconnected controls. 

Each primary flight control system 

must provide for safe flight and landing 
and operate independently after a mal-

function, failure, or jam of any auxil-
iary interconnected control. 

[Amdt. 27–26, 55 FR 8003, Mar. 6, 1990] 

§ 29.675

Stops. 

(a) Each control system must have 

stops that positively limit the range of 
motionof the pilot’s controls. 

(b) Each stop must be located in the 

system so that the range of travel of 
its control is not appreciably affected 
by— 

(1) Wear; 
(2) Slackness; or 
(3) Takeup adjustments. 
(c) Each stop must be able to with-

stand the loads corresponding to the 
design conditions for the system. 

(d) For each main rotor blade— 
(1) Stops that are appropriate to the 

blade design must be provided to limit 
travel of the blade about its hinge 
points; and 

(2) There must be means to keep the 

blade from hitting the droop stops dur-
ing any operation other than starting 
and stopping the rotor. 

(Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, 604, Federal Aviation 
Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423, 1424), 
sec. 6(c), Dept. of Transportation Act (49 
U.S.C. 1655(c))) 

[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150. Dec. 3, 1964, as 
amended by Amdt. 29–17, 43 FR 50599, Oct. 30, 
1978] 

§ 29.679

Control system locks. 

If there is a device to lock the con-

trol system with the rotorcraft on the 
ground or water, there must be means 
to— 

(a) Automatically disengage the lock 

when the pilot operates the controls in 
a normal manner, or limit the oper-
ation of the rotorcraft so as to give un-
mistakable warning to the pilot before 
takeoff; and 

(b) Prevent the lock from engaging in 

flight. 

§ 29.681

Limit load static tests. 

(a) Compliance with the limit load 

requirements of this part must be 
shown by tests in which— 

(1) The direction of the test loads 

produces the most severe loading in the 
control system; and 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00616

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR

background image

607 

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT 

§ 29.695 

(2) Each fitting, pulley, and bracket 

used in attaching the system to the 
main structure is included; 

(b) Compliance must be shown (by 

analyses or individual load tests) with 
the special factor requirements for 
control system joints subject to angu-
lar motion. 

§ 29.683

Operation tests. 

It must be shown by operation tests 

that, when the controls are operated 
from the pilot compartment with the 
control system loaded to correspond 
with loads specified for the system, the 
system is free from— 

(a) Jamming; 
(b) Excessive friction; and 
(c) Excessive deflection. 

§ 29.685

Control system details. 

(a) Each detail of each control sys-

tem must be designed to prevent jam-
ming, chafing, and interference from 
cargo, passengers, loose objects, or the 
freezing of moisture. 

(b) There must be means in the cock-

pit to prevent the entry of foreign ob-
jects into places where they would jam 
the system. 

(c) There must be means to prevent 

the slapping of cables or tubes against 
other parts. 

(d) Cable systems must be designed 

as follows: 

(1) Cables, cable fittings, turn-

buckles, splices, and pulleys must be of 
an acceptable kind. 

(2) The design of cable systems must 

prevent any hazardous change in cable 
tension throughout the range of travel 
under any operating conditions and 
temperature variations. 

(3) No cable smaller than 

1

8

inch di-

ameter may be used in any primary 
control system. 

(4) Pulley kinds and sizes must cor-

respond to the cables with which they 
are used. The pulley-cable combina-
tions and strength values specified in 
MIL-HDBK-5 must be used unless they 
are inapplicable. 

(5) Pulleys must have close fitting 

guards to prevent the cables from being 
displaced or fouled. 

(6) Pulleys must lie close enough to 

the plane passing through the cable to 
prevent the cable from rubbing against 
the pulley flange. 

(7) No fairlead may cause a change in 

cable direction of more than three de-
grees. 

(8) No clevis pin subject to load or 

motion and retained only by cotter 
pins may be used in the control sys-
tem. 

(9) Turnbuckles attached to parts 

having angular motion must be in-
stalled to prevent binding throughout 
the range of travel. 

(10) There must be means for visual 

inspection at each fairlead, pulley, ter-
minal, and turnbuckle. 

(e) Control system joints subject to 

angular motion must incorporate the 
following special factors with respect 
to the ultimate bearing strength of the 
softest material used as a bearing: 

(1) 3.33 for push-pull systems other 

than ball and roller bearing systems. 

(2) 2.0 for cable systems. 
(f) For control system joints, the 

manufacturer’s static, non-Brinell rat-
ing of ball and roller bearings may not 
be exceeded. 

[Doc. No. 5084, 29 FR 16150, Dec. 3, 1964, as 
amended by Amdt. 29–12, 41 FR 55471, Dec. 20, 
1976] 

§ 29.687

Spring devices. 

(a) Each control system spring device 

whose failure could cause flutter or 
other unsafe characteristics must be 
reliable. 

(b) Compliance with paragraph (a) of 

this section must be shown by tests 
simulating service conditions. 

§ 29.691

Autorotation control mecha-

nism. 

Each main rotor blade pitch control 

mechanism must allow rapid entry into 
autorotation after power failure. 

§ 29.695

Power boost and power-oper-

ated control system. 

(a) If a power boost or power-oper-

ated control system is used, an alter-
nate system must be immediately 
available that allows continued safe 
flight and landing in the event of— 

(1) Any single failure in the power 

portion of the system; or 

(2) The failure of all engines. 
(b) Each alternate system may be a 

duplicate power portion or a manually 
operated mechanical system. The 
power portion includes the power 

VerDate Sep<11>2014 

09:06 Jun 28, 2024

Jkt 262046

PO 00000

Frm 00617

Fmt 8010

Sfmt 8010

Y:\SGML\262046.XXX

262046

jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with CFR